The Audit and Inspection Board conducted an audit of the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission and Chairman Jeon Hyun-hee from July last year, but it was said that the reason for the suspension of the former chairman was not recognised.
The Audit and Inspection Board held an audit committee yesterday to discuss the results of the audit regarding the former chairman, and it was decided not to make it an issue, regardless of the four main doubts.
Allegations of constant delays, false instructions for press releases, obstruction of an audit by the Audit and Inspection Board, and unfair interference in the process of authoritative interpretation of the suspicion of preferential treatment for the son of former Justice Minister Choo Mi were investigated. -yeah
The Secretariat of the Audit and Inspection Board tried to hold the former chairman personally accountable, but it is known that the members of the audit committee who decide the final outcome of the audit decided not to make it an issue because they the opinion that the doubt is too weak. hold the head of a ministerial level agency accountable.
However, the Audit and Inspection Board requested disciplinary action because ACRC staff failed to filter out the HR Innovation Department’s accounting errors in the hiring process, and senior officers were substituting graduate school assignments for subordinates, and they will inform the ACRC of ‘care’ It has been transferred.
Yesterday, the audit committee was unusually held in the morning and lasted for about 11 hours until late at night, and General Secretary Yoo Byeong-ho was said to have protested fiercely against Chairman Jeon Hyun’s unconfirmed decision. -heh.
Detailed inspection results will be published next week.
On the other hand, the former chairman was appointed by the former Moon Jae-in Administration, and together with the former Chairman of the Korea Communications Commission Han Sang-hyuk, he has been pressured by the passport to resign immediately after the launch of the Yoon Seok -yeol government.
The Scrutiny and Inspection Board initiated an examination of the former chairman and requested an investigation by the prosecution, claiming that the former chairman had inappropriately intervened in the process of interpreting the case authoritatively and that it had been reported to the air transport.
The former chairman’s term ends on the 27th.
