[사진=공동취재반]
Regarding the recent 11.6 billion won case of forgery and breach of trust in factory land in Namsa-eup, Yongin-si, it is known that the licensing department in charge will take strong measures, such as rejecting the ‘logistics warehouse license application’.
In particular, it was announced that the application for permission itself would be rejected if it did not meet the supplementary conditions presented by the city regarding the application for license and permit for the logistics warehouse of parent company A.
According to the city on the 19th, after issuing supplementary instructions in February for the application for a permit for a distribution warehouse in Bangari, Namsa-eup, which was applied by company A through company B, a civil engineering service company, an official letter urging the implementation of supplementary items was sent again and the period I explained that if my conditions are not met, the license application will be rejected.
It is said that the supplementary instructions presented by the city made Company A, which applied for permission to change the use to a warehouse, bring a court ruling stating that the right to license the factory belongs to them.
In addition, the land owner Asia International requested a supplementary request in February to submit a joint construction agreement, which means that permission cannot proceed without an agreement with Asia International.
A city official said, “If the permit documents are rejected, even if the supplementary measures requested by the city are resolved, the city planning review, environmental impact assessment, and disaster assessment must be taken again from the beginning.”
He continued, “Currently, all legal procedures have been completed, and supplementary measures and even urges have been made.
Accordingly, Cheoin-gu, Yongin-si, recently announced that it would reject the application for road occupancy permission filed by three companies, including company C, which is related to company A, if the supplementary measures requested by the city are not implemented.
Cheo In-goo demanded that Asia International submit an agreement based on the results of receiving legal advice from internal and external lawyers regarding their application for permission to occupy roads, but when it was not fulfilled, it was rejected.
They filed an administrative judgment with Gyeonggi-do in this regard, but it was dismissed.
Cheo In-gu also made it clear that in the event of cancellation or ex officio cancellation of another company D’s factory construction permit, it was decided to notify and negotiate with Asia International, a stakeholder.
Company A, which applied for a change in the use of its logistics warehouse, was found to have purchased factory land with a large loan from the Fisheries Cooperative, etc. while entrusting the site to E Trust.
In the trust ledger on the main register, it is stated that the Yeosu Fisheries Cooperative Association Banpo Branch (priority right amount 5.64 billion won) and Pohang Fisheries Cooperative Bundang Sunae Designation (priority right amount 4.2 billion won) received a loan, and F parent company preferred right amount It is ranked second with 6 billion won.
An official from the National Fisheries Cooperative said, “I was completely unaware of this fact until now.”
Meanwhile, on the 22nd of last month, the Suwon Western Police Station sent two people, including Mr. S and Mr. Y, to the Suwon District Prosecutor’s Office for prosecution on charges such as the Aggravated Punishment Act for Specific Economic Crimes (11.6 billion won breach of trust).
To victims such as Asia International, Mr. S and Mr. Y claimed that they were accused of sharing the permission and permission of the room factory site, which they did not own, to company A for 4.8 billion won, and received only 2.64 billion won as a down payment. .
The victims also revealed that they received and distributed 3.58 billion won in land difference, and that they were charged with taking 6.22 billion won in total.
On January 2nd, the Suwon District Prosecutor’s Office also indicted Mr. S, who forged and secretly sold factory land sales agreements (contracts), etc., without detention on charges of forgery of private documents and companionship, and handed him over to trial.
As the Suwon West Police Station closed and forwarded the case, the prosecution is known to assign it to the Criminal Division immediately and promptly launch an investigation, and it is expected that the full details of the case will be revealed sooner or later.
According to the victim, the 10 billion won ‘Namsa-eup Bangari Factory Site Fraud Case’ is a case in which a large amount of money was obtained by selling building permits and permits using fake documents, with a total of 30 victims, including 15 Bangari.
Since 2020, they have appealed to all walks of life for their injustice, such as holding protests in Yongin City, Suwon District Prosecutor’s Office, Gyeonggi Southern Police Agency, and Suwon West Police Station.
- reporter information
- (Suwon) Kang Dae-woong
- dwkang@ajunews.com
©’Global Economy Newspaper in 5 languages’ Ajou Economy. Unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited
