“Chaiyawut” does not oppose “Thaksin”, stick to the slogan to overcome conflict, raise “Big Fort” with a high compromise
At 2:50 pm on March 28 in Palang Pracharat Party (PPP), Mr Chaiwut Thanakmanusorn, Minister of Digital Economy and Society. As deputy leader of the PPP, he gave an interview about the case of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. Come out and say that it is not silly to give the Prime Minister’s chair to Gen. Prawit Wongsuwan, the Deputy Prime Minister. as the leader of the PPP party that the PPP has a policy to overcome conflict and does not conflict with any party So I do not want to respond to this issue. What works in politics, it works according to the situation Sometimes not always smart There must be some issues that must be decided together.
The reporter asked when he insulted Like this, do we have to meet after the election or not? Mr. Chaiwut said elections are for the people. On the field, we fight to the limit. Especially in all areas that have to fight against each other to the extreme. There was no handshake or agreement on who would be the government or the prime minister. When asked to repeat that Shows you shouldn’t deny or still can’t shake hands. until the election Mr Chaiwut said he emphasized that the PPP has crossed the conflict, so there will be no conditions that will cause conflict. What is useful and accepted by the public Work together, work together Whatever contradiction is not correct, we move over it.
When asked if he wasn’t shaking hands with PPP now because he’s afraid of losing points? Mr Chaiwut said he did not know, he had to ask, each party had its own ideas. Unable to go in exchange, but he confirms that the PPP is not in conflict with anyone, that Gen. A high compromise prawit, reasonable, good talk, that does not bring up politics or political conflict. division I won’t join you She won’t join me I don’t like your face The atmosphere is not something like this at the moment. During this period, different people campaigned. Who is a good policy? Send good candidates. The people chose a country able to move forward But if you divide the parties Don’t take that person, don’t take this person. How will the people live? It’s quarreling time.
