Criminal Court dismissed Khunying Korkaew and the group of jointly forging and using forged documents to transfer 20 billion shares

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

Criminal Court dismissed Khunying Korkaew and others in the case of joint forgery and using forged documents to transfer 20 billion shares, pointing out that the plaintiff’s evidence is not enough to listen. There are experts asserting that it is not a fake handwriting. On the side of ‘Naphon Narongdet’, he is worried about his health and wants to pay respect to his father.

At 10:00 a.m. on July 5, at the Courtroom 712, the Criminal Court, Ratchadaphisek Road. The court read the verdict in the case of joint forgery and use of forged documents of rights, Dam No. 2497/2561 in which KPN Group founder Kasem Narongdej is the plaintiff against Khunying Korkaew Bunyachinda, wife of Pol.Gen.Poj Bunyachinda. Former Director-General of the Police Department, Mr. Nop Narongdej, the middle son and Mr. Suthat Jirajarasporn as the 1-3 defendants.

The plaintiff brought the case to file a lawsuit on August 15, 2018, stating that the defendant sued the defendant, concluding that During the incident, the plaintiff was a major shareholder of Golden Music Limited, amounting to 459,109,350 shares, or 99.99 percent, worth more than 20 billion baht, registered under Hong Kong law. April 2016 to June 26, 2018, related Khunying Korkaew, Mr. Nop and Mr. Suthat, the 1-3 defendants in this case, conspired by using forged documents, causing damage to the plaintiff Kasem.

In the case, on May 14, 2018, Deacons, a legal advisory firm, sent a letter to the plaintiff, Mr. Kasem that the Hong Kong Court has issued a temporary injunction against Golden Company by Mr. Kasem. Transfer of shares held in Wind Energy Holding Company Limited until the Hong Kong court orders the change. If Mr. Kasem violates the order, he will be punished. and compensate for the damage incurred

after the Hong Kong court ordered such Mr. Kasem has sent a notice to the directors of Golden Company to call the shareholders’ meeting. would like to inform the meeting about the need to comply with the Hong Kong Court’s order to the relevant parties for acknowledgement During that time, Mr. Kasem found that Mr. Suthat, the 3rd defendant, was appointed as the director of Golden Company without prior notice. which is a behavior that implies dishonesty including the intention to prevent the shareholders’ meeting from taking place Because Mr. Kasem wanted the meeting to vote to remove Mr. Suthat, the 3rd defendant, from being the company’s director. and appoint new directors to replace Mr. Suthat

In addition, Mr. Kasem informed Mr. Suthat and related persons also know that Mr. Kasem does not agree to transfer the shares held in Golden Company to anyone. to comply with the Hong Kong court order If Mr. Suthat, the 3rd defendant, or Golden Company receives information about the transfer of shares held by Mr. Kasem shall be deemed to be false information or documents. unlawful

Later, on June 19, 2018, Mr. Kasem was informed that Directors of Golden Company resolved and approved the transfer of shares of 459,103,350 shares, which are all shares of Mr. Kasem. To Khunying Korkaew, the 1st defendant, with an agent between Mr. Kasem and Khun Ying Korkaew, stated that there was an agreement to use the transfer of shares. and documents that Mr. Kasem was the person who signed the consent But from the examination of the documents, it was found that Mr. Kasem was not the one who signed the said signature. but the signature was forged Caused by the conspiracy of Khunying Korkaew, Mr. Nop and Mr. Suthat, the 1-3 defendants by the three defendants jointly forged documents of rights stock transfer instrument that Mr. Kasem held in the Golden Company unlawfully to Khunying Korkaew The plaintiff asked the court to sentence the defendants 1-3 according to the offense as well. In this case, the Court of First Instance examined the plaintiff’s cause and found that the case did not have sufficient grounds to dismiss the plaintiff’s appeal. Subsequently, the Court of Appeal considered and ordered the Court of First Instance to accept the case for consideration. The defendant refused, defended the case and received bail. The court has issued a judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s lawsuit.

Mr. Winyat Chartmontri, legal advisor in this case Discussing the reason that the court dismissed the lawsuit that Evidence that the plaintiff can not attest to that. The document was a forged document. Investing in Wind’s shares from the existing shareholders Mr. Nop is the operator and is responsible for paying the shares by himself. The Narongdej family did not participate in the investment. And the credit of the Narongdej family was not used in applying for a loan from the bank in any way. There is also evidence that shows that Mr. Kasem is the person who signs the documents. The number of copies of himself, so the plaintiff’s evidence is not enough to listen. Therefore, there was a verdict to dismiss the lawsuit.

In addition, the court also argued that The documents that Mr. Kasem Narongdej claimed were forged. The documents were previously sent for review in the case where Khunying Korkaew filed a complaint to the investigating officer at Klongton Police Station saying that Mr. Kasem had embezzled Khunying Korkaew’s shares. The experts did not comment that the documents were forged in any way. Importantly, the three defendants had experts registered with the Office of the Court of Justice to testify as witnesses confirming that Such experts examined Mr. Kasem’s signature and concluded that In addition, the three defendants also had legal counsel to testify to confirm that the lawyer provided documents related to the investment in the company. Wind Energy Holding Co., Ltd. and Mr. Kasem had to sign several such documents. This fact is consistent with the fact that Mr. Kasem himself has admitted that He has signed several documents related to the investment in Wind Company.

Khunying Korkaew revealed after the final consideration that Throughout the past, only those who were accused been bullied all the time Being silent doesn’t come out to respond, doesn’t mean we’re wrong. But we wait for the court process. and now the truth has emerged Prove that we are innocent Today it is thanks to the court that you have given us justice. which we must continue to fight As for suing back, we have to consult with the family first. the truth is the truth because in the past he has never taken advantage of cheating anyone

Mr. Nop Narongdej later said that Thank you court and all your support. What he is worried about now is his father’s health. Coincidentally, I just learned from the press that I had to undergo heart surgery. which is a big deal And now what I want to do is to pay respects to my father. and told the truth that he had never forged his father’s signature do everything correctly And I would like to leave the press that I really want to ask for time to prove that I will not disappoint my father and mother in this child. As for the cases under consideration by the Southern Bangkok Criminal Court, they have a similar causal nature, which is a matter of details and facts that are consulted by a team of lawyers. must ask for time to prove the case

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Pocket
WhatsApp

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent News

Editor's Pick