Noo, focus on clarification of breach of ‘profit return clause’… Investigation into the background of Yoo Dong-gyu’s appointment
Jae-myung Lee, “Is this the place for interrogation of criminals?”
The ruling and opposition parties clashed again over the ‘Daejang-dong development suspicion’, which is the biggest issue in politics, at the Gyeonggi-do government audit on the 20th by the National Assembly Land, Infrastructure and Transport Committee.
Following the National Inspection of the Public Administration and Security Committee on the 18th, the ‘Daejang-dong Daejeon’ reminiscent of the ‘Presidential Candidate Hearing’ against the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate Lee Jae-myung continued.
The People’s Power tried to extort the possibility of Lee’s breach of trust by including a clause on the return of excess profits amid criticism from some that he suffered a ‘decision loss’ at the National Supervisory Service of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security two days ago.
The Democratic Party counterattacked, saying, “It is the power of the people that has prevented the redemption of development profits,” and that the Daejang-dong development project is an exemplary case of public redemption, and began to cover Lee in all directions.
Candidate Lee declared a non-response policy, saying, “I will not answer outside the scope of the audit” to the opposition’s personal allegations.
In addition, he responded strongly to inquiries from opposition lawmakers, saying, “Is this a place for interrogation of criminals?”
◇ Wild “The culprit is the designer, Jae-myung Lee” vs. “The first designer of the Daejang-dong project, MB, Kuk-him”
Rep. Park Seong-min, the People’s Power, repeatedly insisted that the ‘body’ of the suspicion of large bowel movement was Lee, and argued that “the culprit is the designer, and the culprit in this case is Lee Jae-myung.”
Rep. Song Seok-joon of the same party called the Daejang-dong development project “a preference for corruption in real estate development in Daejang-dong, close to 1 trillion won.”
Justice Party lawmaker Shim Sang-jeong said, “Some citizens told me to say it.
‘The person who received the money is the criminal, and the person who designed it is a sinner'” He said, ‘I designed the Daejang-dong project’, directly hitting the candidate.
Assemblyman Shim said, “The Daejang-dong project has become a symbol of inequality and injustice, but if you take a look at what the governor said, it was my fault that part of the public interest repayment was my own fault, everything I did wrong was everyone else’s fault, and I can’t remember the troubles.” ‘Isn’t it ‘Inner Gongnambul’?” he said.
On the other hand, Democratic Party lawmaker Kang Jun-hyeon said, “The people who intentionally abandoned the public development of the LH (Korea Land and Housing Corporation) and designed the Daejang-dong project for the first time for the purpose of preserving the profits of private businesses were MB (former President Lee Myung-bak) and the People’s Power.” claimed that
Rep. Kim Yun-deok of the same party criticized, “It hurts my heart to become the head of state to kill Lee Jae-myung.
Rep. Jin Seong-jun also said, “It is the people’s strength that desperately stopped the public development of Daejang-dong that gave a bomb of preferential treatment to private developers.”
Rep. Cheon Jun-ho said, “You can understand the performance of the Daejang-dong development project by looking at the development profit recovery structure of the Busan L-City project,” and the opposition party countered that “the business structure is fundamentally different.”
Candidate Lee also repeated the claim that the Daejang-dong development project was “the largest public interest restitution project since Dangun,” saying, “It is a model case of 550 billion won, 70% of which was monopolized by a certain minority.”
“The culprit of corruption is the person who received the money.
The person who owns the item is a thief.
◇ No, “Excessive profit redemption blocking, breach of trust” · Investigation of Yoo Dong-gyu’s appointment… Lee “It’s not a betrayal”
Rep. Kim Eun-hye, a member of the People’s Power, told Candidate Lee, “By blocking the return of excess profits from the private sector, close to 1 trillion won was poured into Hwacheon Daewoo, but that is a breach of trust.
If you don’t know, you’re incompetent.”
He also said, “In relation to the missing excess profit redemption clause, he changed the subject in one day (in Lee’s answer). .
Justice Party lawmaker Shim Sang-jeong said, “People are angry over how a person who invests 80 million won can earn 100 billion won or 1,000 times more.” Of the total profits of the Daejang-dong project, 75-90% went to the private sector,” he said, pointing out that the provision for recovering excess profits was omitted.
On the other hand, Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Yun-deok said, “According to the logic of the opposition, the Park Geun-hye administration designed and promoted New Stay in the same period and in the same region.
Candidate Lee said, “I was not aware of the proposal for redemption of excess profits at the time,” and said, “How could not accept the opinion of the (working-level staff) logically be a breach of trust?”
He also said, “The Seongnam City Council should praise if the power of the people rejected (public development) and put pressure on it to recover 550 billion won even through a public-private partnership.
People’s Power Rep. Lee Jong-bae asked Yoo Dong-gyu, the former head of Seongnam Urban Development Corporation, who drew the line that Lee was ‘just a corrupt employee,’ and asked, “Did you ever tell me to hire this person?”
When Candidate Lee answered, “I don’t know” or “I don’t remember,” Rep. Lee said, “I understand that he said, ‘I never intervened or directed.'” As if answering questions about perjury, they had a nerve war in mind.
◇ Minju, Kim Yong-pan attacked ‘fake money bundle’… Silence on ‘ rumors of gangster involvement’
The Democratic Party took advantage of the fact that Kim Yong-pan, a member of the National Assembly of the National Security Council two days ago, raised the allegation of Lee’s involvement in a gangster and presented a ‘fake photo of a bundle of money’ as a point of attack.
Rep. So Byeong-hoon of the Democratic Party said, “Apologize to Rep. Kim, who talked about gangsters at the National Security Council.”
Kim Yun-deok, a member of the same party, also said, “I heard false facts that have not been verified, so I was a gangster, so I drove the witnesses with this provocative material.
I’m sorry,” he added.
Members of the People’s Power, who suffered a lot from Rep. Kim Yong-pan’s ‘photo of a bundle of money’ at the Ministry of Public Administration and Security, did not ask questions about the ‘gangster involvement’ that day.
Instead, the People’s Power, with only five members of the National Assembly, continued to ask questions that seemed to aim at the possibility of accusations of ‘perjury’ in the future, such as arguing that if Lee’s remarks were prolonged, he said, “Answer with ‘yes or no’.”
On that day, Democratic Party lawmaker Jo Eung-cheon, who served as the chairman of the Gyeonggi State Audit Team, responded with a loud voice to the opposition party who protested that Lee’s response was long.
People’s Power Rep. Song Seok-joon took out a ‘dog in sheep’s clothing’ doll and the meeting went limp at one time, and the ruling and opposition secretaries could not agree on whether to ask for additional questions. There was even a clash between the opposition parties until the very end.
/yunhap news
