Newsletter

DEA submits “Chuan” objection to amend Section 112, voicing that it is ready to protect the people. with the King as Head of State

NSO submits “Chuan” objection to amendment of Section 112, reiterating that if amendments are made, all networks are prepared to move, confirming that they are ready to protect the National Council for Peace and Order with the King as head of state To tamper with “Tae Vocational”, prepare to submit an additional list on November 5, saying he wants to increase the punishment from light to heavy, while “woman from Ayutthaya” lashes out at 2 political parties for sure, put up a campaign sign to knock down the institution, cut again, do not secretly blue leave the party

On November 3, 21, at the National Assembly, Mr. Anon Klinkaew, a representative of the People’s Defense Institute (SSO) Group, submitted a letter to Mr. Chuan Leekpai, Speaker of the House of Representatives. Through Mr. Tan Khun Jit Issara, Working Group of the President of the House of Representatives to oppose the amendment of Article 112

Mr. Anon said that as it is well known that bringing the King into politics is not appropriate. because the King was not involved in politics at all But there are some political parties looking to amend the section related to the monarchy, causing them, the NSO and various networks to dissatisfaction therefore came to submit a letter objecting to the amendment of Section 112 to Mr. Chuan

Mr. Anon continued that since on October 31, A rally was held to hunt down a list of names calling for the repeal of the Section 112 law of the same group of people with distorted behavior. and inferior to the monarchy which trespass Jab Zhuang Institute which respects the faith of the Thai people They also exhibit slanderous, inferior, distorted and malicious behavior, such as the burning of royal portraits in public areas. symbolic street painting for institutional impairment inciting youth and people to misunderstand that the monarchy is an obstacle in the development of the country These behaviors are not constructive and have no legal legitimacy. Therefore, it can be regarded as a threat to Thai society.

Mr Anon also said that on behalf of the people’s collective public defending institutions and networks that are loyal to the nation, religion, monarchy. as well as adhere to the democratic regime of government with the King as Head of State Therefore, I would like to inform you that if there is an amendment to Section 112 law People’s groups protecting the monarchy People’s Center protects all institutions and networks. will come out and move and oppose in every way to protect the democratic system with the King as Head of State

On the side of Mr. Noppadon Phromphasit, as the chairman of the Center for Legal Aid for Social Bully Victims (School), said he came to express his stance against the amendment or repeal of Section 112. for the reason that the way NESDB has been working on this case since the beginning. There are 21 other cases in the Technology Crime Suppression Division (TCSD) that notified mob leaders who committed offenses under Section 112. Which has completed 9 cases, 12 cases are in the process of litigation. Therefore, he, as a person who is directly involved in Section 112, will object to those who wish to amend this section. The amendment to the law meant that he was deliberately committing an offense that was clearly prohibited by the law, which he clearly wanted to take down the institution.

“I would like to leave this to those who wish to become great. Don’t even think about pulling the institution down and destroying it. Even if you throw stones and ask for directions But here’s proof that you’re hitting the hornet’s nest, the hornet’s nest, the honeycomb. If you haven’t stopped Toss a stone asking for directions to edit or cancel. You will have to retaliate hard,” said Noppadon.

Mr. Akrawut Kraisrisombat, or Tae Occupational, said that for today, everyone has submitted a petition to oppose the amendment of Article 112. Sometimes he disagrees with the Parties. to oppose the amendment of Section 112 But what they want to fix is ​​that the punishment is light and wants to be heavier. because the new generation does not respect and fear the law But if we strengthen the punishment in the law He said that the new generation who attacked the institute would be afraid and did not dare to do it. He believes that today, whether he fixes it or not, cheeks.112 it’s not a problem The problem is that the child is afraid or not afraid. and he would like to leave it to the people who have spoiled these children: to remove the blue But it can’t be removed from the person. Today the Parties come here only, but on November 5, they will bring the names to submit to see what is the difference between 28,000 names and 1,000,000 names. There are many people who are loyal to the institution. Some people are brave Some people do not dare to express Today they have expressed It’s up to others to consider.

As a representative of the villagers from Ayutthaya said, please tell the two big political parties that you will find many more. And if it’s true, put a campaign label on it that you’re downing the institution. Don’t come and secretly remove the blue from the party. Don’t use cheaters again and again to cheat us Thai people. which we are ready to protect the institution