hurry! The Constitutional Court passed a decision on the election law MPs do not violate the constitution

On November 30, if the President of the National Assembly presented the opinion of members of the House of Representatives (MPs) and senators (Senators) asking the Constitutional Court to decide in accordance with Section 148, paragraph one (1) of the Constitution Section 25 and Section 26 of the Organic Act on the Election of Members of the House of Representatives (No…) BE …. contain provisions which are contrary to or inconsistent with Section 93 and Section 94 of the Constitution and was. not being in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution or not (Subject No. 20/2565) A total of 105 MPs and senators submitted their views to the President of the National Assembly (complainant) to submit to the Constitutional Court for a decision.

On November 9, 2022, the Constitutional Court argued to lead to a diagnosis and saw that the case is a legal issue. and have sufficient evidence for judgment Therefore, the investigation was terminated under the Organic Act on Constitutional Court Procedures 2018, Section 58, paragraph one. The appointment for oral presentation, consultation and decision was scheduled for Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 9:30 am

Most recently, today at 12:35 pm, the Constitutional Court had a consultation and a vote. Then declare that orally Organic Measure on the Election of Members of the House of Representatives (No …), BE ….

The President of the National Assembly sent the opinion of members of the House of Representatives and Senators to ask for it
The Constitutional Court ruled in accordance with Section 148 paragraph one (1) of the Constitution in conjunction with Section 132 that the Organic Bill on the Election of Members of the House of Representatives (No.) BE is contrary to Section 93 and Section 94 of r Act. Constitution or not, and whether it was enacted contrary to the provisions of Section 132 of the Constitution or not (Topic No. 20/2565)

A total of 105 members of the House of Representatives and Senators submitted their names to present their views.
for the President of the National Assembly (petitioner) to submit to the Constitutional Court (1) the organic law bill on the Election of Members of the House of Representatives (No..) BE …. Section 25 and Section 26 contain statements which n contrary to or inconsistent with Section 93 and Section 94 of the Constitution; Was the election of members of the House of Representatives (No.) BE …. unlawfully enacted in accordance with the provisions of section 132 of the Constitution?

result

The Constitutional Court ruled unanimously that the organic law bill
Election of Members of the House of Representatives (No..) BE …. Enacted in accordance with the provisions of Section 132 of the Constitution and the Organic Bill on the Election of Members to the House of Representatives (No.) BE The Professor …. Section 25 does not contain any statements that are contrary to the Constitution, or inconsistent with it, Section 93 and Section 94, and has a decision by majority vote.

(7 to 2) decree that Section 26 of the Organic Bill on the Election of Members of the House of Representatives (No.) BE …. does not contain any provisions contrary to or inconsistent with Section 93 and Section 94 of the Constitution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.