The university council has decided to remove ‘Suebpong Prabyai’ from the rector for the 2nd round for breaking km. February and received a transfer of assets relating to an unusual wealth commission, together with the appointment of Assistant Professor Dr. Boonchan Thongrayoon, acting president
At 1:30 pm on November 8, Ramkhamhaeng University Council (Mr. Ror.) issued press release No. 1 on the subject. Removal of Assistant Professor Suebpong Prabyai, President of the universityAfter the school council held a meeting regarding considering the results of the investigation Asst. and having banned qualifications to hold the office of Rector The meeting considered several issues. related all around As a result, it was decided to withdraw from the position of rector of the university.and should inform the community Universities in all sectors Acknowledge the facts as follows:
Because the office of the President of the university is the highest administrative position of the university. The person holding the position deserves to maintain the desired characteristics of the executive in accordance with the regulations. University on strictly prohibited qualifications and characteristics of executives 2019. Be a role model of a good leader for administrators, faculty, staff, personnel and students. both former students and current students This was to maintain the honor, reputation and good governance of the university, but Assistant Professor Suebpong Prabyai had broken the law. government regulations Cabinet Decisions and University regulations and rules, in particular the University regulations on the qualifications and prohibited characteristics of executives 2019 in the following circumstances
1. Assistant Professor Suebpong used a doctoral degree that was not accredited by the Office. February when applying to be recruited as university employees for the post of teacher The Faculty of Education reported, from the Office of the Civil Service Commission, to the MRC, of the examination of the qualification Ph.D. from Assistant Confidential letter from the Office of the Civil Service Commission dated 10 August 2022
However, the use of educational qualifications in the office OCSC certification is considered an important qualification according to the regulations. The University on the Management of University Employee Personnel State Budget, BE 2551, Item 20.1, and the RMS Regulation on the Management of University Employee Personnel, 2013, Article 26(1), which states that university employees in academic fields may receive salaries in according to their qualifications and accordingly means that the qualifications of university employees, academic subjects who will be able to receive a salary at the salary rate determined by the OCSC must be eligible in the office. OCSC certified only And from the provisions in the regulations, these two issues would show that education qualifications in the office OCSC certification is considered an important qualification for recruiting people to be University university employees very much . To recruit people to meet the university’s requirements, including qualifications from academic programs that meet international standards. so that determining pay rates for qualifications is appropriate and fair
Therefore, the office of the Civil Service Commission, which has the legal authority to check the educational qualifications of those who will be established as civil servants or government official in a government agency together with regulations of The university is still attached at the office. February on the accreditation of educational qualifications In the case of complaints relating to the degree of Ph.D. Professor Suebpong’s assistant, it can be heard that Ass Prof. Suebpong is eligible to be a university employee. Faculty of Education teacher post since the beginning and will not get teaching results. or experience in management which will qualify for the recruitment of a University Rector under Section 23 of GA1998 BE
2. Assistant Professor Suebpong accepted the transfer of assets relating to the commission of unusual wealth. This is a crime of dishonesty by Mr. So by accepting the transfer of such assets. It is a transfer of 2 plots of land, namely, Title Deed No. 52022, Bang Pla Kod Subdistrict, Ongkharak District, Nakhon Nayok Province, and Title Deed No. 52023, Bang Pla Kod Subdistrict, Ongkharak District, Nakhon Nayok Province, on December 15 , 2011, Assistant Professor Suebpong has been recruited as a university employee. And the transfer of such assets happened after the Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) appointed a sub-committee to investigate Mr Sor in case there was reason to believe that Mr Sor Ruea was usually wrong. And in the end, Professor Asst Suebpong was sentenced by the Supreme Court to confiscate the two plots of land and become land under Supreme Court Judgment No. 469/2018.
In addition, the committee to consider and offer an opinion appointed by the council The university also examined additional facts After the judgment of the Supreme Court, Assistant Professor Suebpong did not submit the two plots of land under the judgment of the Supreme Court Until a period of approximately two years passed until the Ministry of Finance submitted a legal transfer application by issuing a substitute title deed. And the change was registered through the transfer register to the Ministry of Finance on February 27, 2020.
Throughout the past, Assistant Professor Suebpong, both as an MU employee and later served as President of the Faculty Council, Dean of the Graduate School. The University Council Committee all the way until he currently holds the position of University Rector Instead, they never reported to the university, despite the fact that it was important to inform the university. Because it is connected to the property. and prohibited qualifications for executive officers And it is contrary to Cabinet decisions as well as contrary to the Civil Service Regulations Act in Higher Education Institutions. 2004, Section 39, last paragraph
and Section 40, including such circumstances, may be linked to offenses under other relevant laws such as the Anti-Money Laundering Act BE Offenses relating to the transfer of assets relating to the commission of an offense to conceal or conceal the source of the property or to help others, whether before, during or after the commission of an offense to avoid punishment or receive a reduced sentence for preliminary offenses This is a money laundering offense under Section 5 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act 1999 and she has a period of 15 years.
3. Assistant Professor Suebpong Toklao presents a petition asking for justice from His Majesty the King with false statements deliberately distorting information slandering the University council committee with trimming information without irresponsible conscience and self-interest is important to stop the council The university conducts an inspection or investigation of various complaint matters
In the case of an appeal to the King Since Assistant Professor Suebpong was once removed from the President’s office with a charge of willful violation of the MRA regulations at the University Council meeting, 1998, but he resumed his duties with a temporary protection order from the Supreme Administrative Court. But Assistant Professor Suebpong also deliberately used the duplicate right to inform the King. Offer a petition asking for justice, even though the matter is still being considered by the Central Administrative Court Details of the offer Make a petition with a false statement And how inappropriate is that?
For all the reasons mentioned above If considering the honor of the position of rector who is considered the highest executive of the university to have leadership And it is accepted by the practitioners in the university. by adhering to morality, ethics, integrity and fairness in society together with the social anger against corruption in all its forms It can be considered that the actions mentioned Asst. which is a prohibited characteristic of executives under Article 7(4) of MR.RU Regulations on Qualifications and prohibited characteristics of executives, BE 2562 (2019)
Therefore, all the above circumstances of Assistant Professor Suebpong, together with the facts and evidence presented would be enough for the council The university will no longer trust Asst, Professor Suebpong as president. and deserves the advice The university will have a decision to remove from the office of the president of the university From the date of the decision onwards which is the use of the absolute power and discretion of the MR. 2541 and cause Professor Suebpong’s Assistant to leave the office of the President immediately under Section 23 paragraph three (6) of the 1998 Act.
The reporter reported that the MR Council had established Assistant Professor Dr. Boonchan Thongrayoon The University Council Committee and the Director of the Institute of International Education Acting President of the University
