Kandi Burruss Accuses Todd Tucker of Squatting & Avoiding Child Support

The divorce between Kandi Burruss and Todd Tucker is escalating, with accusations of financial neglect and, surprisingly, a claim of “squatting.” Burruss, known for her role on February 16, 2026 as a star of “The Real Housewives of Atlanta,” has filed court documents alleging that Tucker is living rent-free in her Atlanta guest house while failing to contribute to the financial support of their two children, Ace (10) and Blaze (6).

According to documents obtained by TMZ, Burruss asserts that the guest house is her sole property, purchased prior to her marriage to Tucker. She claims he hasn’t paid for any upkeep of the property, including utilities, lawn care, pest control, or even the alarm system. Beyond the housing situation, Burruss alleges Tucker has been largely absent as a supportive parent and hasn’t assisted with expenses related to their children’s upbringing, such as tuition, school supplies, or even birthday celebrations – despite attending both of their recent birthday parties.

The filing specifically requests that a judge order Tucker to provide child support and contribute to the children’s expenses, as well as establish a formal parenting time schedule. Burruss’s claims paint a picture of a strained co-parenting relationship and a significant financial imbalance in the wake of their November 2025 divorce.

However, Tucker is contesting these accusations. In his own court filing, he admits to residing in the guest house but claims it was a result of Burruss unilaterally removing him from the main home. He alleges that she directed family members to pack up his belongings without his consent or court intervention. This paints a different picture – one of a husband being effectively evicted rather than a squatter refusing to leave.

Regarding the financial support of their children, Tucker states that prior to their separation, he and Burruss jointly deposited funds into an account specifically for household expenses. He claims that after the split, Burruss informed him she would assume full financial responsibility and handle all bills herself. Tucker argues that Burruss is now attempting to “reframe and weaponize” this previous arrangement to portray him as financially irresponsible.

The situation is further complicated by Tucker’s request for temporary primary legal and physical custody of Ace and Blaze until a permanent parenting agreement can be established. This counters Burruss’s assertion that she is the primary caregiver, despite her demanding professional life, which currently includes a role on Broadway in New York City. She has reportedly hired a nanny to assist with childcare while balancing her commitments in both Atlanta and New York.

The dynamic is particularly noteworthy given Tucker’s public persona. While Burruss suggests he projects an image of an active father on social media, she contends that his actions don’t align with that portrayal. This discrepancy between public image and alleged reality is a common thread in many high-profile divorces, adding another layer of complexity to this case.

The legal battle is unfolding against the backdrop of the couple’s public life as reality television stars. The accusations and counter-accusations are likely to fuel further discussion among fans of “The Real Housewives of Atlanta,” and the case could potentially play out, at least in part, on future seasons of the show. The details of the dispute, as outlined in the court documents, offer a glimpse behind the carefully curated image often presented on reality television.

The case highlights the often-contentious financial and custodial issues that arise during divorce proceedings, even for those with significant financial resources. The accusations of financial neglect and the dispute over living arrangements underscore the emotional and practical challenges of separating shared lives and co-parenting after a marriage ends. The judge’s decision will likely set the stage for the future relationship between Burruss and Tucker, and, more importantly, the well-being of their two children.

As of February 16, 2026, the case remains ongoing, with both parties presenting their arguments and seeking favorable outcomes in court. The next steps will involve further legal proceedings and potentially mediation, as the couple attempts to navigate the complexities of their divorce and establish a sustainable path forward.