Newsletter

Legal response to “100 million used Lamborghini’s handle is cut in two after unwrapping”

[이데일리 정시내 기자] A buyer who bought a used supercar ‘Lamborghini’ worth 100 million won said that he would take legal action, saying that the car was damaged when the wrapping was removed.

On the 14th, on the online community ‘Bobae Dream’, an article titled ‘I wish I could live with my boss’ was posted and drew attention.

photo = baby dream

Buyer A bought a used ‘Lamborghini’ for 115 million won from seller B living in Gangneung on the 10th.

He said, “The seller allowed me to test drive it, so I tried it. It seemed that there were only a few warning lights that didn’t seem to have any major problems in the diagnostics, and the driving feeling was better than I thought, so I decided to buy it without much thought on the way back after I decided that I could ride it with my hands a little bit.”

Following

He continued, “However, I kept getting concerned about the fact that it was wrapped, so I asked the car owner several times.” “If there is a problem with ‘the condition was clean before wrapping’, I will solve it myself.’ He said that he checked again at the place where he worked, and ranted about the condition of the vehicle.” Then, he revealed the text he shared with the person who was believed to be Mr. B.

After that, on the evening of the day the car arrived, Mr. A removed the wrapping, and the car was damaged everywhere.

According to Mr. A, the two-piece handle was attached with a glue gun, and signs of damage to the side mirror were also found. In particular, the A-pillar near the passenger seat (the pillars on both sides of the windshield) had most of the paint peeled off due to excessive sanding. A said that he requested a refund.

“Even the seller didn’t know. He said that if he had seen this, he would have thought it was an accident.

However, Mr. B’s father appeared and said, “Take the wrap uniform and put it back in place. Then I will give you a refund.”

In the end, A and B did not proceed with the refund process smoothly. In response, Mr. A said, “I have received legal advice and information about the complaint procedure from my senior lawyer and a detective at the police station, and I am in the process of filing a complaint.”

photo = baby dream

When the article became a hot topic, seller B made a statement. He claimed that he did not know the state of the painting after removing the lapping because he did not do the lapping himself.

Mr. B said, “I said that I would refund if the wrapping is restored.” “In the process of sending the car to the wrapping company, the buyer asked for a deposit first, and I said that I would refund after I received the car. This is where I started getting louder with the buyer.”

Mr. B said, “I am receiving unconditional criticism and swearing for saying that I will never give a refund.

Meanwhile, netizens commented, “Is 100 million a joke? Change your stance and think”, “If the handle is broken, refund it. It’s a scam”, “I can refund it after subtracting the lapping fee”, “I sold it by cheating, but I should refund it”, etc.

.