New Zealand governments are "deaf to develop science" says Opportunity Party leader (TOP) Geoff Simmons.
TOP seeks to deregulate a gene editing form called CRISPR, a technique that can be used to remove undesirable characteristics of an organism or to add desirable ones.
Genetic editing (GE) could be used for things like starting the genetic trigger for cystic fibrosis in a person, making manuka more resilient in the rust of the fiche or helps with kauri trees go combat death.
Simmons from the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification in 2001, but it was not possible to use genetic modification (GM) technology in New Zealand.
"It was that 18 years ago – pre-Facebook, pre-Twitter and pre-smart phone. There have been many changes since, except for our regulation on genetics."
Current New Zealand legislation restricts any form of GM. Research can be done here, but the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) must clear any organized organism before it can be released.
Only two organisms have been approved since 2003, and both have been vaccinated for horses.
The Simmons proposal differs from other types of GM – it does not add any new genetic material to an organism, it only changes the existing things.
Research already underway in New Zealand includes a seagragh form organized by AgResearch which grows 50 percent faster, requiring less water and creates cattle for 23 percent less methane.
The company considers that the grass may result in additional income but due to current constraints it cannot be grown here.
Gene editing using CRISPR can be limited to one organism or made so that the gene is forwarded to each subsequent generation.
Opponents warn more of the controversy, as organized genes can quickly spread through populations and across borders, and the technique could be used to destroy whole species by editing the genes governing reproduction.
This could be particularly effective in eliminating species with short lifespan, such as mosquitoes or rats. However, scientists warn that the elimination of complete species could have harmful and catastrophic effects on ecosystems.
Conservation Minister Eugenie Sage actively banned any research on gene editing earlier this year, writing a Letter of Prospects to Free Predator 2050 Limited, telling them not to invest in technology-related research.
This was despite the advice of the Conservation Department for Sage saying "[gene editing] It is one of the approaches capable of achieving the 2025 interim target for a decisive scientific solution for the eradication of predators. "
With the breadth of GE's applications and the potential of passing secret effects there are anti-GM advocates giving warnings on gene editing 'wild west', claiming that we don't know enough about consequences. long term.
Last year, a Chinese scientist drew a huge international background by announcing that a few babies were making genetically edited genes to be more against HIV. His claims cannot be checked, as it is impossible to test GE after the truth.
I posted on their website, GE Free New Zealand broke TOP proposals.
"Until GE technology, only the 6 year old person is old."[sic], the public has shown that the TOP party is inaccurate and that it misleads the public as a desire to acquire a political party. "
Read the full statement from GE Free New Zealand here.
Geoff Simmons was quick back.
"GE's lack of understanding of science is amazing. In fact, their response to our policy boundaries is a clear misdirection."
Speaking to Newshub Nation, Simmons said that the TOP genetic editing is suggesting that there is only a faster version of techniques already in use in agriculture.
"The main difference is that gene editing is very different with old genetic modification. 'No new genetic material is added to it, it has identical results with optional breeding."
Since it is impossible to test if an organism was gene editing, Simmons says that the people of New Zealand already have genetically modified crops.
"If you see any new potato, or apple or anything coming out of the United States now, I say it's organized."
The United States has much more relaxed laws on GE and farmers have no obligation to labeled editorial stock.
The TOP leader suggests that New Zealand is in danger of being left behind.
"With the restrictions we suggest, there is no genetic editing. We are facing some major problems, such as feeding by 1050 people by 2050 and also reducing our impact on the environment."
View Newshub Nation 9:30 am Saturday / 10 am Sunday on TV3, and follow us on Facebook and Twitter. NZ On Air supports Newshub Nation.