‘PDP’ waited to hear the reason before voting, asked back to amend the constitution, requiring the voice of the senator, but instead offered to clear it.

‘PDP’ waited to hear the reason before voting, asked back to amend the constitution, requiring the voice of the senator, but instead offered to clear it.

at 8:40 a.m. on November 16 at the National Assembly. Mr. Chinnawan Boonyakiat, Member of Parliament for Nakhon Si Thammarat Democratic Party (PDP) as the chairman of the Democratic Party. Announced that today, the meeting of the National Assembly will consider the draft constitution amendment. The edition that Mr. Prit Watcharasindu and the people jointly signed and proposed. The party has assigned MPs to debate and ask questions to the people’s sector. First, the principles of democracy that we have used. What we call the principle in the parliamentary system with the King as Head of State If we still have these questions in society There will be conflicts.

Mr. Chinnawan said that secondly, the abolition of the senator to have a unicameral legislature which has never happened in a democracy in Thailand Only in a dictatorship. Third, the establishment of the Inspector of the Constitutional Court. Inspector of the Court of Justice and inspectors in independent organizations Will the re-establishment conflict or contradict the existing 3 sovereignty? Fourth, the origin of the independent organization. If there is a change by allowing politicians to come in as inspectors or to nominate, if a political party has a dictatorial majority one day, how will Parliament solve these problems?

“Cancel the order of the coup Which, of course, no one wants to happen. But when the coup became a sovereign power The consent order is legal. Therefore, I would like to ask how the process of abolition will be done. And finally, the proponents of the draft are aware that under Article 256 of the Constitution requires 1 in 3 or 83 votes of the senators to approve in one agenda to accept the principle. If it doesn’t reach the figure, it must fall. But the proposal to cancel the senator is a direct hit. Therefore, I would like to ask what the proponents want. Therefore, the NACC, as an experienced editor, would like to hear an clarification. for further decision-making,” said Mr. Chinnawan.