On February 2, 2023, after the Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) join the Anti-Corruption and Misconduct Division (Landlords Department) and the Office of the Public Sector Anti-Corruption Commission (PAD) enterarrestMr.Paitoon Phumchor Director of Bangchan School (Pluem Wittayanusorn) when collecting money from the counterpartyFood preparation contract project (successfully prepared) for students in semester 2/2022 ofBangchan School (Pluem Wittayanusorn) Khlong Sam Wa District Office in the work room with evidence of cash in the amount of 329,000 baht
There are news reports that After completing the questioning process, Mr. Paitoonapply for bailin the questioning stage to get temporary relief by bringing cash in the amount of 4 hundred thousand baht set as collateral Before investigating officials, the PPP will consider and see that the person has no behavior flee along with jobs and the address is the main source allowing temporary release and making an appointment to meet again after the case is over and send the matter to the office NACC is considering further legal procedures.
By the way, on February 2, 2023, Dr. Wantanee Wattana, Deputy Permanent Secretary of Bangkok acting in place of the permanent secretary of Bangkok revealed the case School Director Bangchan (Pluem Wittayanusorn), Khlong Sam Wa District, was arrested by the Sonthi State Agency forClaim money for a child’s lunch in accordance with the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration’s policy of “transparency, no sacrifice”, the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration will speed up the investigation and act with the utmost decisiveness within the framework prescribed by law. by establishing an investigative committee And in the meantime, the director of that school will be considered to suspend government service for the time being. If he is found to have committed serious disciplinary offenses The penalty is dismissal. or dismissed from government service
Previously, on February 1, 2023, at 6:30 pm, Mr Niwatchai Kasemmongkol, Secretary General of the NACC, as spokesperson for the NACC Office, Mr Phumwisan Kasemsuk, secretary general of the committee. Lt. Gen. Jirapob Puridet, Police Commissioner Central Investigation, Mr. Sornchai Chuwichian, NACC Assistant Secretary General, and Pol The NACC joined forces with the Anti-Corruption and Misconduct Division (BACC) and the Office of the Anti-Corruption Commission to arrest Mr. Paitoon Phumchor , 58, director of Bang Chan School. Pluem Wittayanusorn for being guilty of “being an officer demanding or agreeing to receive property or any other benefits and being an officer acting or omitting to act improperly” at the Bangchan Pluem Wittayanusorn School office Phraya Suren Road, Bang Chan Sub-District, Khlong Sam District Wa, Bangkok The arrest was under Operation “Quail Eggs”.
Due to previously receiving complaints that Mr. Paitoon abused his authority, there was an act of demanding money from the counterparty or the entrepreneur who won the bid for the building project for students in semester 2/2022 of Bangchan School. (Pluem Wittayanusorn) for 329,000 baht, claiming that it will be used to improve materials, equipment, tables, chairs inside the school canteen. And collect an additional monthly payment of 9,000 baht per month. It is claimed that the last amount is the cost of looking after the teachers who are responsible for the food program for 5 students.
by reasoning that The entrepreneur has already made a profit from the project. If they do not comply, they will terminate the contract. or make a report to Bangkok that Entrepreneurs get a lot of difference in breakfast because school children don’t come to eat. After knowing the matter, he arranged to go to the area to inspect until he learned that he has behaviors that are actually within the scope of such crimes. So planning for the entrepreneur to distribute the money to Mr. Paitoon as requested before the police could be brought in to arrest him along with the money mentioned above.
From the investigation, Mr. refused. Paitoon, claiming that he had not received any money. But he admitted, before being arrested, that the entrepreneur had actually been invited to meet. But it is a meeting to discuss the problems that have been complained about food quality only. As for the money envelope on the table I don’t know if it belongs to the operator. Did the person forget it? But definitely not theirs.
