Superintendent Jo goes to court, denies killing intent in black bag cover case get really hurt but doing it for the benefit of the nation Just want to expand the effects of drug cases that are harmful to society.
At 09.30 am on 19 November 64 at the Central Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct Cases, Nakhon Chaisi Road, the court scheduled an examination of the defendant’s testimony. Black Case No. Tor.180/2564 Public prosecutor of the Corruption Suppression Case Office 3 is the plaintiff sued. Pol Col. Thitisan Uthanaphon or Superintendent Jo, former superintendent of Muang Nakhon Sawan Police Station, 39 years old, the 1st defendant, Pol. Maj. Rawirot Distong, 38, the 2nd defendant, Pol. Lt. Col. Songyot Klainak, 41 years old, 3rd defendant, Pol Lt. Col. Taranin Maswanna, 55 years old, 4th defendant, Pol. Maj. Wisut Bunkhiao, 51, 5th defendant, Pol Maj. Supakorn Nimchuen, 46 years old, the 6th defendant and Pol. Lt. Col. Paweekon Khammasaeng, the 7th defendant.
In the first charge: 1. An offense of being an official jointly performing or neglecting to perform or refraining from performing duties dishonestly under Section 157 of the Criminal Code; damage to any person according to the Anti-Corruption Act, B.E. 2561 4. to rape others to do anything by causing fear that it will endanger life, Criminal Code, Section 309
As a result of Mr. Chiraphong or Mawin Thanapat, a suspect in the drug case has died. While being arrested and in custody in a drug case and murdered to death while under the custody of an officer During the period between 4-6 Aug. 64 at the Nakhon Sawan Police Station.
Today, the court withdraws all the defendants from the Bangkok Special Prison. to test testimony and Police Lieutenant Chakkrit Klandee, father of Mr. Jirapong Apply as a joint plaintiff The court asked the plaintiff’s prosecutor and the defendant’s attorney not to object to permission to be a joint plaintiff.
When the court reads the indictment and charges to the defendant The defendant’s testimony was examined by Pol. Col. Thitisan or Superintendent Jo. The 1st defendant pleaded guilty to charges 1, 2 and 4, except for the 3rd charge, stating the reason that admitting that there was physical harm Want to expand the effects of drug cases that are a threat to society did not want Mr. Jirapong to die made for the benefit of the nation
The second defendant admitted to pleading guilty to all charges. Except for the third charge as well, stating that it was not intended to cause the deceased to die. Just participate in the event according to the commander’s order.
The 3rd defendant denied charges 3 and 4 and reasoned that came to the scene later and did not join in harming the deceased
The 4th defendant denied all allegations. Except for the 4th charge that pleads guilty The reason for the refusal stated that Follow orders from supervisors join in real harm but not intended to be fatal
As for the defendants 5-7, they denied all allegations. The 5th and 7th defendants reasoned that they were in the event according to the commander’s order. But did not join the attack. The sixth defendant stated that he entered the scene. then walk out by the event has already happened
Later, at 11:30 a.m., Police Lieutenant Chakkrit Klandee, Mr. Marwin’s father, revealed that the prosecutor in Nakhon Sawan recommended that a lawyer be appointed. to request to be a joint plaintiff which the court had mercy on because I just asked to file a complaint today making it possible to be a joint plaintiff and will know every step of the legal process When listening to the defendant’s testimony He thinks that he is justified. that it works in order to expand the effects of drugs But I feel sorry for the child Today, I still see the image of the child being abused. really unacceptable So today I came to know how he will testify. and seek justice from the court And the court made an appointment to examine the evidence again on 19 January 65 at 09.30
When asked if he had heard the defendant’s testimony and had any concerns, Lt. Col. Chakkrit said that he actually didn’t think much. We cannot claim more. to be in accordance with the court’s consideration process better
