Superintendent Joe calls for justice make an appointment to check evidence Received that it actually covered many black bags. But it wasn’t too tight to the point that the clip was edited. The police made a lie
At 10:00 a.m. on 19 January 2022, the Central Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct Cases on Nakhon Chaisri Road, the court arranged to examine the evidence of the black criminal case No. Or Tor. Pol Col. Thitisan or Jo Uthanaphon or Superintendent Jo and a group of 7 people are accused for committing an offense of being an official together to act or neglect to perform duties wrongly to cause damage to the people. any one or acting or refraining from performing duties dishonestly,
being a State official jointly acting or refraining from performing any act in his position or duty or using his power in his position or duty wrongly to cause damage to any person or performing or refraining from performing duties dishonestly, collectively killing others by torture or by cruelty
and together from five or more people to rape others to do anything no action or surrender to anything out of fear that it will endanger the life, body, liberty, reputation or property of the compromised person or of others or by using violence until the compelled person has to commit such an act not doing that or surrendering to it According to the Criminal Code, Sections 83, 157, 288, 289(5), 309, paragraph 2, the Organic Act on Prevention and Suppression of Corruption, B.E. 2561, Section 4,172
This is due to Mr. Chiraphong or Mawin Thanapat, the deceased, who was arrested and held in custody in a drug case and was killed while under the control of officials. During the period between 4-6 August 2021 at Nakhon Sawan Police Station, the plaintiff, the co-plaintiff and the defendants 1-7 from the prison, including all the defendants’ lawyers, came to court. The court has examined the evidence and let the plaintiffs, co-defendants, defendants 1-7, and the defendant’s lawyers to examine them.
The 7 defendants acknowledged the fact that during the incident, all 7 defendants were police officers with the duty of investigating, arresting, suppressing under the law as state officials. On the day of the accident, Mr. Chiraphong or Marwin and Ms. Kanokwan (with their surnames) were arrested after evidence was found to be a drug class 1 methamphetamine flakes. or 300 grams of ice
Then the arrest kit examined Mr. Chiraphong’s mobile phone or Mawin found that there were many photos of the drug box. Therefore, he searched the house belonging to Mr. Chiraphong’s father, but found no evidence. Later, the 1-7 defendants brought Mr. Chirapong to investigate and expand the results at the Special Narcotics Laboratory 05 and the 1st defendant brought Several plastic bags covered Mr Jirapong’s head, and defendants 2-7 were in the room at the time of the accident. Wear a dress on the day of the accident according to the documentary evidence in the document.
The court has scheduled an appointment to examine all 23 witnesses, scheduled for 19-21 Feb. 65 and 5-6, 12-13 Mar. 65, however, the original date of 13 Feb.65 had to be canceled because the court could move to new office Go to Chimplee Subdistrict, Taling Chan District, Bangkok.
Reporters reported that during the examination of evidence Police Colonel Thitisan, the 1st defendant, wore a light brown prison uniform. His face was solemn throughout the consideration. has announced to the court that On the day of the incident, he admitted that he had covered many black bags with Mr. Chiraphong. but not snatched so tightly that he suffocated just scare
and asked the court to help verify the clip that was sent for the first time Because the clip was edited to bring the picture of trying to save Mr. Chiraphong’s life. and clips of some police officers who were at the scene and falsely stated that he was not at the scene because the owner of the clip was involved in the knowledge and he has sent the full clip through a lawyer to the court for consideration
by the court that All court clips will be used as evidence objects. If the defendants see different things, let’s say that in the class of consideration. and if it is seen that after examining all the witnesses as scheduled, the facts are incomplete The court may consider adding witnesses later.
Later, Mr. Chokchai Angkaew, a lawyer for Pol. Col. Thitisan, revealed that the first witness examinations were scheduled for February 19-20. In this case, a total of seven witness examinations have been scheduled, the last date on March 13. The case is now in court proceedings. He acts as a lawyer. The inquiry system is a system in which the court seeks facts. What is not enough, the court will see for himself.
