Home News The court did not provide insurance for the 4 people’s leaders after submitting an appeal. Compare the case of 8 DPW.

The court did not provide insurance for the 4 people’s leaders after submitting an appeal. Compare the case of 8 DPW.

by news dir

The court did not grant the insurance. Four leaders indicated that there was no reason to change the original order. After the lawyer filed an appeal, comparable to the DPRK 8 that was decided by the Court of First Instance And ask for bail

From the case yesterday (February 26) that Mr. Norasat Na Nongtum, a lawyer, filed an appeal for bail for the mob leader group consisting of Mr. Anon Nampa, Mr. Prit Chivarak, Mr. Somyot Prueksakasem. Suk and Mr. Pathiwat Sarai Yam, 4 leaders and the coalition of people. Detained in a special Bangkok prison Not get bail After being filed a lawsuit against 19 September, reclaiming power to return citizens for offenses under Criminal Code, Section 112, Section 116 and other charges

After the former Director-General of the Dean of Thammasat University and the former Dean of the Faculty of Law Thammasat University Filed for a provisional release on February 22, but the court did not allow the temporary release. And the Court of Appeal ordered to insure 8 members of the NBTC’s leadership, making the lawyers team From the Lawyers for Human Rights Center Appealed the order not to bail Mr. Prit Chivarak with them to the Appeal Court. Compare each issue according to the reasons that the Court of Appeal allows bail in the NCPO case.

On February 27, the reporter reported that Mr. Noraset Na Nong Tum, attorney of the Right Attorney Center. Has posted on Facebook stating that the Appeal Court ordered not to allow bail to the People’s Group, Mr. Prit Chivarak with the reason that There is no reason to change the original order.

Related Articles

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.