Newsletter

“Trirong” pointed out the fighters against the UDD. Must oppose both the military dictatorship, the dictatorship of the Council, and the politicians who do not act are cowards.

“Trirong” pointed out the fighters against the UDD. Must oppose both the military dictatorship, the dictatorship of the Council, and the politicians who do not act are cowards.

Date 24 Sep 2021 time 08:02

Former Deputy Prime Minister wrote an article “Corruption and the political system”, pointing out that fighters for democracy You have to oppose both the military dictatorship, the dictatorship of the Council, and press the politicians. If you don’t do it, you are considered a coward.

On September 24, 1964, Mr. Trairong Suwankhiri, former Deputy Prime Minister In the government, Mr. Abhisit Vejjajiva posted an article on Facebook. Dr. Trairong Suwankhiri stated that corruption and the political system.

1) If we ask people in general Go to the non-academic why he hates the dictatorship. He would answer and explain based on a few basic feelings, for example:

1.1) He doesn’t like it because Dictators often use their power arbitrarily. Don’t be afraid that someone will check. because it is a system that tries not to be checked and does not want to have different opinions, will find a way to crush those who oppose power without concern for humanitarian principles

1.2) When there is no review, i.e. no active opposition There is no independent organization that can truly have the freedom to audit. Dictators will not be concerned with law and morality, will conspire to use their power to exploit (CORRUPTION) to create wealth for themselves, their relatives, and their close supporters on the natural slenderness and inability to grow. country

1.3) They tend to be narcissistic that they are only smarter and smarter than others. Don’t have to listen to anyone’s voice, don’t have to pay attention to different opinions. Only listen to the opinions of the flatterers. Therefore, they often make reckless decisions, trial and error, even if they cause enormous damage to the nation at times. they just don’t care pretend not to see and pretend to forget He only thought that the land budget was not mine. It’s not my mom’s money. And it’s not Myegu’s money. (Let’s review that in the past How much has the nation been damaged by such ideas of politicians and powerful people?)

2) A dictatorship with all three of the aforementioned behaviors can occur both in the form of total dictatorship of the military force as has happened in Thailand. Field Marshal Sarit Thanarat, Hitler’s dictator in Germany dictator mussolini in italy Dictator General Pinose of Chile Indonesian dictator Suharto There have been and are still such dictatorships in many other countries in Africa and the Middle East.

Another type of dictatorship is civil dictatorship. (Some call it a parliamentary dictatorship) because it is a dictatorship that uses the electoral system as a stepping stone to supremacy. Once that power is obtained, it will use it to destroy the opposition, the journalism, to destroy the system of transparency checks. After that, there was a convenient way to do evil. behaving badly like a complete military dictator (Sometimes even worse.) The world has seen many dictatorships in this form, such as Peron’s dictatorship in Argentina. Fujimuri dictator in Peru Diaz Dictator (DIAZ) and the PRI Party for 70 Years in Mexico, Marcos Dictatorship in the Philippines Dictator Chavez in Venezuela and Thaksin dictatorship in Thailand (Even Hitler’s dictator and Mussolini dictator may also be included in this group.)

Two forms of dictatorship may not be born evil If weak political and bureaucratic systems allow him to be so. because having so much power by lack of monitoring can Always make good people bad.

3) Real democracy fighters have to oppose those two forms of dictatorship. without exception Although there has never been a country in the world that has a perfect democracy based on true ideals. But there should be a democratic form that is appropriate to the traditions. people’s temperament and the history of that country will copy anyone’s style To use it like a 100%, there is no way it’s possible. And there is no way to achieve peace, transparency and smooth progress in all aspects.

Of course, one of the cornerstones of a democracy is the majority in parliament. (in the English and French systems) must have the right to form a government (mainly vule), but the exercise of such powers must be transparent. does not violate the rule of law and must be for the benefit of the nation and the people only

As a result, we have never heard anyone condemn Mr Lee Kuan Yew as a dictator of Singapore because Lee Kuan Yew and his colleagues have never been corrupted. Anyone with bad behavior will be immediately stripped of Mr. Lee Kuan Yew’s political power. Even the president of the country has been fired.

But who would come to think of copying Singapore’s politics and government to use with Thailand is a mistake because Thai people are not Singaporeans. Thai politicians are still many times far from the standards of Singapore politicians (including salaries).

4) Rules for determining the form of politics and governance of the country therefore must be of great importance Whoever’s it any superpower will come to coerce to intervene in order to allow any country Those who are weaker to use the system and rules of politics to govern as their own would be incorrect. Incorrect in both political theory and international etiquette.

The People’s Republic of China’s political and ruling system is also suitable for many contexts, including their history. His type of (centralized) democracy is probably best for his country. Who is to say that American democracy is better than China’s? It is not and is not correct. Most of the Chinese people are probably satisfied with their system. Of course, it’s not 100% either. Otherwise, how could there be the Tiananmen Rebellion (1999) and the Hong Kong Democracy Rebellion a year or two ago?

5) American democratic politics if accepting the truth There is no prejudice to speak, it is just Politics designed for the poor to choose representatives of the rich. only to establish a government to rule the country English is the same France is the same Germany is the same Japan is the same, etc. If there were some exceptions, it would be a country in Scandinavia. Because people in the whole country have very similar incomes. their elected government Therefore, it can be assumed that it is a government that truly represents the majority of the people. (That is the government of the people, by the people, and for the people. quite close to reality, although not 100%)

6) Countries with very high income differences between the elites, ie many poor people. There are few rich people The middle class is also weak. Politics will be controlled by the wealthy class. Because they can still buy votes from the poor in various constituencies across the country, and once they are in the House of Representatives, they can also buy votes from politicians, both from the ruling party’s MPs and from the opposition party’s MPs. Therefore, it will be able to run the country smoothly and stably. President Lincoln of the United States Without this approach, there was or would be a constitutional amendment to abolish slavery in the December 13th Amendment of 1865, or would any American dare to argue that this was “not true.” Forget that I learned this from Harvard University (USA)

Note: A person is superior to an animal in that its meat price per kilogram is many times more expensive than the meat of an animal, although the meat of a human cannot eat a single bite.

7) The rules for determining the form of government of each country must be sensitive. truly aligned with the context of that country. Various democratic theories It’s all ideal. Help is just a compass pointing the way. But I haven’t seen any country in the world that can do it 100%. Of course, democracy is better than dictatorship. But don’t be so mad at the theory that you forget that my country is not like other people’s countries. Your system must be suitable for your country. Other countries should not be obtrusive. Because my country is not your country. Your father is not your father. Your father is not your father.

Western democracies The more strict the Western theory is, the farther it is from the context of reality. both as a person of the people and as a country of the country even more so The best person to teach this subject is Professor Pierre LEGRAND of the University of Paris

I was invited to teach comparative legal systems at the University of Cambridge, England, where I had the opportunity to become his student in 2012 (when I went to study constitutional law at the University of Cambridge. bridge)

Conclusion : Any politician who rumbles saying that I love democracy But there is not enough courage to resist and prevent the nation from having one of these two forms of dictatorship seriously. Just say it to make yourself look good. but the bottom of his heart is full of cowardice and only greed for benefits not being sincere to the nation and the future of the country in any way because they already knew Both forms of dictatorship cause fraud. enormous corruption Corruption and corruption are a real deterrent to the prosperity of Thailand. Preventing corruption must start with the prevention of both forms of dictatorship. It is considered a necessity at the top level ever.

I would like to inform you that the comments posted on Facebook It is a personal opinion, not related to the Democratic Party in any way.

<!–

–>

.

Trending