Kim Seon-ho. Photo｜TvN ‘Gaet Village Cha Cha Cha’ official websiteI am just a reporter who knows how to become a so-called ‘giregi’, but spends every day trying to avoid going down that road as much as possible. It is the job of a reporter to cover and write articles on entertainment issues that make a lot of noise, but this time, I would like to present an ‘opinion’ disguised as an article.
The recent issue that has eroded the celebrity is the privacy scandal of actor Kim Seon-ho. The wave that started in a community post that his ex-girlfriend anonymously exposed it eventually flowed out of control as not only Kim Seon-ho, but also the real name of the ex-girlfriend (hereafter ex-girlfriend) who posted the post was revealed. Even though the painful love story was revealed, surprisingly, it seemed to end with Kim Seon-ho’s plaster mortal sin rather than a muddy fight.
Kim Seon-ho apologized, and his ex-girlfriend accepted his apology. However, Kim Seon-ho, who was running on the trendiest road, had a big flaw in his image, and as a result, he got off badly from the entertainment program KBS2 ‘1 Night 2 Days’ in which he was appearing, followed by ‘stop loss’ at the advertiser. Up to this point, it is not much different from the path that other celebrities caught up in scandals have walked.
However, the development after that is not so serious. It is an uncommon trend in the bottom ecosystem until the provocative keyword that means ‘that thing’ between Kim Seon-ho and his ex-girlfriend is plastered on the Internet. (?) went out to expose, but came out with wrong facts and disappeared, while the seaweed soup episode that appeared in the media article that exposed the reality of his ex-girlfriend through a text message provided by Kim Seon-ho’s acquaintance is Kim Seon-ho’s past. In connection with the remarks in ‘2 Days & 1 Night’, Kim Seon-ho is suddenly asked for clarification.
where is that As netizens who certify that they are Kim Seon-ho’s college classmates through graduation albums and photos taken with him, praise or criticize Kim Seon-ho’s personality, are pouring out through the community, and numerous rumors surrounding Kim Seon-ho are spreading on the Internet. have. I wonder what the hell is this
It was a bit of a belated move, but it was a provocative report from a media outlet that Kim Seon-ho apologized to his ex and got off the program and rekindled the situation while he was rectifying the situation. Kim Seon-ho’s acquaintances and ex-girlfriend’s acquaintances would have judged it to be a disclosure of their own ‘facts’, but even if the content of the report crossed the line, it went far beyond that, and in the end it only resulted in the reproduction of unnecessary issues. Since Kim Seon-ho has no reason to respond, as his extreme private life and private conversations have been revealed, unreasonable demands for expression of his position are continuing.
Separated from the wounds Kim Sun-ho gave to his ex (I will withhold judgment on whether it is the part that is wrong. It is not something for those who are not involved in the relationship between lovers), the ongoing privacy issue is whether it is unnecessary goodwill for Kim Seon-ho, or it is not to my liking. It’s only because of those who go out with a intent to bring down him who has heard it. There is no reason for Kim Seon-ho to explain and explain these contents one by one and convince the public.
Even his ‘seaweed soup’ is the same. Whether Kim Seon-ho cooked it for his ex-girlfriend, or cooked it for his mother’s birthday as he said in a variety show, is that a fact that must be pointed out? Even if it is to ‘verify’ whether or not the remarks in the variety show were false, this is a request that goes beyond the limit. What if it was cooked for both of them?
The same goes for the part about the reality of the ex-girlfriend. Kim Seon-ho said that his ex-girlfriend had a lot of luxury, so it was really hard, and he chose to break up because he was tired of his ex-girlfriend’s lies. It is perfectly normal and common sense for Kim Seon-ho not to respond in this situation.
People who know Kim Seon-ho say that they want to do something for Kim Seon-ho, who is so cornered, but they get tired of hearing good stories. However, for Kim Seon-ho, no matter how much he wants to prevent rumors and revelations, there seems to be no way to stop them as the dam has already burst. Maybe he wants to shout, “Please, please stop” (with a tone of smoke), but he becomes a marionette whose limbs are tied to strings, and he is only being moved by the temperature of public opinion.
Celebrities are said to be ‘public figures’ in a broad sense, but there is no reason to answer this extreme privacy. The right to privacy is prior to the public’s right to know. It is said that a so-called ‘celebrity tax’ is imposed on celebrities, but the current one is too much.
Is Kim Seon-ho’s apology vague? Even after the tardiness response, the response is the worst? well If what he wants from Kim Seon-ho and Kim Seon-ho is YES or NO, he has already said everything he wants to say. Rather, I want to ask I don’t know if you look at the lines. If you, who is asking for an answer from Seon-ho Kim, are asked the same, what would you say?
I am an individual who did not have feelings for the actor Kim Seon-ho, but I want to convey this. “Kim Seon-ho, who has become an unscrupulous man, please don’t say anything and protect yourself as long as it’s like this anyway.”
[박세연 스타투데이 기자]
[ⓒ 매일경제 & mk.co.kr, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]
