Home World Why these six senators voted against the new epidemic bailout case | Republican Party | Bailout Act

Why these six senators voted against the new epidemic bailout case | Republican Party | Bailout Act

by news dir

[Epoch Times December 23, 2020](Epoch Times reporter Gao Shan compiled a report) After months of stalled negotiations, the Congress finally approved a new 900 billion yuan project on Monday (December 21). US dollar epidemic relief plan. The plan received overwhelming support in the Senate. But six Republicans still expressed firm opposition to it.

According to “Foxnews” (Foxnews), these six include: Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas Republican, Senator Ron Johnson, Republican of Wisconsin, Senator Mike Lee, Republican of Utah, Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, Senator Republican of Florida Rick Scott.

According to reports, the bill is tied to a $1.4 trillion spending bill that includes the purpose of avoiding government shutdowns. The six senators’ criticism of the bailout bill focused on its size, including the amount and the number of pages of the bill.

Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky

Republican Senator Rand Paul said in the Senate: “For those so-called conservatives who quickly agreed with the Democratic Party’s socialist stance, if you vote for this huge expenditure monster, you are no better than them. go with.”

He said to his colleagues in the Republican Party: “When you vote for free funding, you lose your soul and forever give up any ostensible moral or financial justice.”

Instead, Paul suggested that lawmakers should open up the economy, reduce the obvious waste in budgets, and stop accumulating debt for future generations.

Senator Rick Scott, Republican of Florida

Similarly, Scott also attacked what he considered unnecessary and expensive relief measures, and warned that it would have consequences for taxpayers.

He wrote on Twitter: “Once again, in a typical Washington style, attach an important item to a huge comprehensive spending bill. This bill is taking our children and grandchildren’s future as a mortgage. Debt. Therefore, I cannot support this bill.”

See also  Vaccination allowed for all adults in the United States, running toward independence from coronavirus

Scott issued a longer statement on Twitter in which he lamented: “Washington does not seem to understand that this new expenditure today will increase federal debt and lead to future household tax increases.” He mentioned However, his position is consistent with his consistent opposition to the “huge waste” bill.

He said: “Congress continues to hurt the future generations of the United States. The simple approach is of course to follow the trend, but I will not participate in it.”

Senator Martha Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee

Blackburn recognizes that this legislation can indeed achieve some positive goals, such as developing and distributing vaccines, assisting schools, and helping small businesses, but she said it is not worth paying such a high price.

She said in a statement: “I cannot support this total expenditure of nearly US$2.4 trillion, which will make recovery more difficult. I am seriously concerned about some of the provisions in this 5593-page bill. Such as the expansion of visas. , Pell grants for prisoners, and financial impact subsidies for illegal immigrant families. For these reasons, I voted against the passage of this legislation.”

Senator Ron Johnson, Republican of Wisconsin

Johnson said that he was “happy that the US government shutdown could be avoided, and that many people who really need relief are finally able to get financial relief,” but he explained that he opposed the legislation because of the “dysfunction” of the process.

Johnson said in a statement: “The dysfunction in Washington, D.C. has been fully demonstrated. Congress passed a large-scale comprehensive spending bill three months after the deadline. This bill has continued until this time. Fiscal year.” “This behemoth is 5,593 pages long and passed 9 hours after the Senate first saw it.”

See also  China's trade surplus with the US hit 3.178 | RYT9

Johnson warned that since there is no time to review the lengthy bill, it may take several weeks or months for lawmakers to understand all the content contained therein.

He said: “I can’t support this dysfunction at all, so I voted against it.”

Johnson stated that he supported the CARES Act earlier this year because it was necessary to “take rapid and large-scale actions to prevent economic collapse.” However, this time, he tends to take a more targeted approach, a very thin bill drafted in September, and the bill can still provide more than $600 billion in relief.

He continued: “We don’t have an unlimited checking account. We must use federal funds (that’s the money we borrow from future generations) more carefully, and limit what we prepare for future generations. The risks to be taken in the future.”

Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas

Cruz and Lee also criticized the legislative process, and lawmakers only have a few hours to read the thousands of pages of bills. After hearing Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s criticism that he had no time to review this large bill and had to vote, Cruz also agreed with the left-wing Democrat.

Cruz wrote on Twitter: “It’s absurd to negotiate a spending bill of approximately $2.5 trillion in secret, but require a few hours later to vote on a bill that no one has time to read.”

Cruz also criticized the Democratic Party in a statement released on Tuesday (December 22) morning, claiming that the bill “facilitates the interests of radical leftists, special interest groups, and marsh lobbyists, and that funds will be used to expand the protection of foreign workers. The H-2B visa is authorized, and the number of unemployed in the United States is still close to the highest level in history.” He also said that this “set the stage for the Democratic Party to implement the so-called “Green New Deal”, that is, to declare that it “needs” to meet the U.S. electricity demand through clean, renewable or zero-emission energy.

See also  "Distance adjustment is the last card"... 926 new and 24 dead

Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah

Mike Lee demonstrated the difficult logistics of reading thousands of pages in such a short period of time, and a video he posted on Twitter showed how long it would take to just print it out.

Lee said in the video: “Because of the length of the space, it is impossible for anyone to have the opportunity to read this bill between now and when we vote.” “I am absolutely certain that this is the work of a small group of congressmen and their work. The personnel are pieced together, and 98% of members of Congress in both houses and parties are excluded.”

After making this statement via video with a printer running in the background, Li noticed that it took about 3 minutes to print the first 100 pages of the bill.

He said: “This process of requiring members of Congress to blindly comply with the legislation negotiated completely secretly by four colleagues must end.”

Editor in charge: Ye Ziwei#


Related Articles

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.