A shocking recording file was released that said that he tried to drive singer Young-tak, who has been caught up in various controversies recently, as a ‘male flower snake’.
On the 29th, The Fact released a video titled “Young-tak to ‘OO’…’ ‘Recording of Eumhae Situation’ released” on YouTube.
The released transcript contains phone calls between whistleblower A, who reported that there is a force undermining Young-tak on the 19th, and YouTuber B, a former entertainment reporter.
During the phone call, Mr. B said to Mr. A, “I decided to meet Young-tak’s auntie. Young-tak is meeting to give him the power to stock up.” He said, “She is the woman Young-tak sponsored. So, I made Young-tak like a rattlesnake (male flower snake)… ‘ and showed a situation where he was trying to harm Young-tak.
Person A said, “At the time, Mr. B mentioned Young-tak while explaining to me that rattlesnake means ‘male flower snake’. You can’t expose it. Let’s not even do it like that,'” he said.
However, on the 10th, Mr. B uploaded a tampered recording file on his YouTube and tried to harm.
C, who appeared in the video of Mr. B, asked, “What is the music source hoarding?” Mr. C, from Young-tak’s agency, said, “I worked with Young-tak and Jae-gyu.”
According to the original transcript, when Mr. C asked, “What about sajaegi? Who?” Mr. D said, “I worked with Young-tak and Jae-gyu Lee. But that failed.” B’s video was manipulated as if Young Tak was directly involved in the sound source hoarding by erasing “I”.
Previously, Young Tak was embroiled in a controversy over music hoarding.
It is known that the representative of Young Tak’s agency was introduced to a marketing company capable of manipulating the number of streaming streams and gave him 30 million won in order to earn the ranking and profit of Young Tak’s song ‘Why Are You Here’ released on October 21, 2018.
However, when the music rankings did not rise as expected, they requested a refund, and after receiving 15 million won back, they filed a lawsuit for unfair profit back in October 2019. However, an order to dismiss the commander was received.
The police investigation began in earnest after the complaint of Mr. A was received. The police conducted a search, seizure, and summons investigation of those involved in music hoarding. During the investigation, Young-tak claimed, “I did not recognize the music source sajaegi.” In fact, as a result of the investigation by the investigative agency, Young Tak was finally acquitted in the relevance section.
.
