뉴진스 하니 무시당했다더니…아일릿 90도 인사는 확실히 보였다
어도어-하이브 분쟁 관련 심문 내용 요약
Table of Contents
주요 쟁점 및 어도어 측 주장:
하니 ‘무시해’ 발언 관련:
어도어 측은 하니가 아일릿 소속사 빌리프랩 구성원으로부터 ‘무시해’라는 말을 들었다는 주장이 ‘사실과 다름’을 입증하는 CCTV 영상을 공개. 영상에서 아일릿 멤버들은 하니에게 90도 인사를 함. CCTV에 음성 녹음 기능이 없어 발언 여부 확인은 불가하나, 빌리프랩 측에 사실 관계 확인 및 재발 방지 요구 조치를 취했음.
‘음악산업리포트’ 유출 의혹:
어도어 측은 뉴진스가 어도어와 계약 해지를 일방 선언하는 근거로 삼았던 하이브 내부 문건 ‘음악산업리포트’를 민희진 전 대표가 유출했다는 의혹을 제기.
문건이 언론에 유출된 시점과 민 전 대표의 문건 ‘반복 열람’ 시점이 겹치는 점을 근거로 제시하며,’열람 기록’을 증거로 제출.
리포트 문제 제기 시점:
어도어 측은 논란의 리포트가 2023년 5월 민희진 전 대표를 포함한 어도어 이사진에게 송부되었음에도 당시에는 아무런 문제 제기가 없었던 점을 지적.
리포트에 ‘뉴진스 빼고 새 판 짠다’는 내용이 포함되어 있었다면 민 전 대표가 이를 묵과했을 리 없다는 의문을 제기.
기타:
기사 하단에는 연예 관련 다른 기사 링크들이 제공됨.
Unpacking the ADOR-HYBE Conflict: Key Questions & Answers
The conflict between ADOR (a HYBE subsidiary) and HYBE Corporation has been a hot topic in the K-Pop industry. This Q&A-style article breaks down the key issues, claims, and rebuttals surrounding the dispute, offering a clear understanding of the situation.
Key Points and Claims from ADOR’s Perspective:
Q: What is ADOR’s stance on the ”Moosimhe” allegations involving Haerin (NewJeans)?
A: ADOR claims that HYBE is distorting the facts surrounding an alleged incident where Haerin supposedly used the word “moosimhe”, ADOR maintains that the claim is factually incorrect and produced CCTV footage to support their argument. The footage shows NewJeans members giving Haerin a 90-degree bow by way of greeting.
Further Details: While the CCTV footage lacks audio recording capabilities, making it unfeasible to confirm the alleged statement, ADOR has requested HYBE to confirm the facts, apologize and take measures to prevent recurrence
Q: What is ADOR alleging regarding the leak of the HYBE internal document, the “Music Industry Report”?
A: ADOR alleges that Min Hee-jin, CEO of ADOR, leaked internal HYBE documents, specifically the “Music Industry Report”, in an attempt to prematurely disclose the contract termination between NewJeans and ADOR.
Alleged Timeline: ADOR points out discrepancies between the time the internal document was leaked and when Min Hee-jin’s “Copy of Attention” text messages were created, suggesting an incorrect timeline.
Evidence Presented: ADOR provided captures of “Copy of Attention” as key proof.
Q: What concerns does ADOR raise about the “Report’s” Creation Timeline?
A: ADOR points out that the controversial report was circulated to executives, including ADOR CEO Min Hee-jin, in May 2023. Despite this distribution, concerns surrounding its content were seemingly not raised at the time.
Lack of Immediate Response: ADOR questions why there wasn’t an immediate concern raised regarding potential issues within the report.
“NewJeans Insults” claim: ADOR highlights that the ”Report” contained content that could be interpreted as insulting towards NewJeans which CEO Min Hee-jin finds problematic.
Summary Table:
| Issue | ADOR’s Main Claim |
| ——————————————– | ————————————————————————————————————————– |
| “Moosimhe” allegations | HYBE distorted the facts. |
| “Music industry Report” Leak Allegation | Min Hee-jin leaked the report to manipulate a premature termination of NewJeans-ADOR Contract. |
| Distributing the Report | Despite ADOR and HYBE having the report in hand,HYBE did not voice concerns. |
What is the current status of the ADOR-HYBE conflict?
The conflict is ongoing, with both sides presenting their arguments publicly.Further investigations and legal proceedings are likely to follow.
how does this conflict affect NewJeans?
The conflict creates uncertainty about NewJeans’ future and management.
What are the potential outcomes of this dispute?
* Potential outcomes range from a reconciliation between ADOR and HYBE to a complete separation, which could involve legal battles.
This article provides a summary of ADOR’s claims. As the conflict unfolds,more facts will emerge,and the situation may change. Stay tuned for further updates.