중국 개봉 한한령 해제 수순? 현지에서는 글쎄
<Mickey17> Debuts in China: A U.S. Film viewed Through a Korean Lens
Table of Contents
- <Mickey17> Debuts in China: A U.S. Film viewed Through a Korean Lens
- Mickey17 in China: Q&A on Cultural Exchange and Film Regulations
- About Mickey17
- China and Korean Cultural Imports
- What is “Hanryeong” and how does it affect Korean cultural imports in China?
- Is the release of Mickey17 a sign that the “Hanryeong” is being lifted?
- What is the current stance of the Chinese government regarding Korean cultural imports?
- Beyond Mickey17, what other foreign films are slated for release in china?
- Impact and Perspectives
Regulatory Thaws and Shifting Perceptions in the Chinese Film Market
Signs of a Potential Cultural exchange Resurgence Between Korea and China
Bong Joon-ho’s latest cinematic endeavor, <Mickey17>, has officially premiered across theaters in China, sparking both excitement and speculation within the film industry.
<Mickey17> Chinese Poster
Industry insiders note that the film’s release coincides with ongoing discussions regarding the easing of “Hanryeong” (ííë ¹), an unofficial ban on Korean cultural imports in China, implemented following South Korea’s deployment of the THAAD missile defense system. However, local industry sources temper expectations, describing the situation as “cautious anticipation.”
<Mickey17> began its theatrical run in China on March 7th, under the title <Bon Hoa (ç·¨è) 17>. Directed by Bong Joon-ho and featuring a cast including Robert Pattinson and Mark Ruffalo, the film is distributed by Warner Brothers, a global entertainment giant. The movie is based on the science fiction novel <Mickey7> by American author Edward Ashton.
Chinese film enthusiasts are reportedly thrilled about the release, marking Bong joon-ho’s first new film in six years. Chinese media outlets, including Huanqiu Shibao and Beijing Qingnian Bao, have highlighted the significance, noting it as “Bong Joon-ho’s first new work in 6 years after receiving the 2019 Academy Award for <Parasite>.”
Eager reactions have emerged, with some expressing, “Seeing Bong Joon-ho’s movie in theaters is like waiting 12 years (since <Snowpiercer>),” and others adding, “<Parasite> should also be re-released.”
The connection to Korean cinema is undeniable. The film is being promoted as a blockbuster, lauded for its critical themes, the actors’ performances, and Bong Joon-ho’s unique direction.
In China, <Mickey17> is recognized both as “Bong Joon-ho’s film” and as a “Hollywood movie.” However,there’s speculation that the film’s release is tied to the easing of restrictions on Korean content. Some observers suggest that the premiere of <Mickey17>, a U.S. production by a prominent Korean director, could alleviate concerns about the re-release of Korean films in China.
Several American blockbusters and animated films, including <Wonder Woman 4>, <captain America: Brave New World>, <Kung Fu Panda 4>, and <Inside Out 2>, are also slated for release in China.
Lee Guk-bong, a research professor at the Institute for Far Eastern Studies, stated, “<Mickey17> is an American movie, but director Bong Joon-ho is a director who represents Korea, and his influence is well known in China.” He added, “It truly seems that this point was considered in the import permission process, in an atmosphere of generally trying to expand Korea-China cultural exchange.”
Conversely, sources within the Chinese entertainment industry suggest that there has been no explicit directive from the Chinese government regarding the easing of the “Hanryeong.”
One film industry insider active in China commented, “<Mickey17> was released as an American film, and the release was decided relatively early.” They further explained, “Because the Chinese government has not taken a clear stance (regarding the ‘Hanryeong’), foreign importers are reviewing Korean films, but are not making concrete purchase offers.”
Li qiang, China’s premier, mentioned “attracting foreign investment through cultural openness with quality” during a government work report at the National People’s Congress on march 5th. Though, it remains unclear whether this includes Korean popular culture. While the emphasis on “quality” suggests a potential reopening for cultural imports, there are concerns that restrictions may still exist, such as limitations on direct interactions between Korean celebrities and Chinese fans.
Hwang Jae-ho, a professor of Korean foreign studies, remarked, “It is difficult to see that <Mickey17> being imported into China as a Korean film, or as an American film, has anything to do with the ‘hanryeong’.” Though, he added, “Looking at the recent improvement in Korea-China relations, it truly seems that the import of Korean popular culture will eventually be resumed,” noting that Xi Jinping’s potential visit to South Korea during the APEC summit in Gyeongju in October or November could serve as a turning point.
Mickey17 in China: Q&A on Cultural Exchange and Film Regulations
This article explores the premiere of Bong Joon-ho’s “Mickey17” in China and its broader implications for cultural exchange between China and South Korea amidst regulatory considerations.
About Mickey17
What is “Mickey17” and who is behind it?
“Mickey17” is a science fiction film directed by the acclaimed South Korean director Bong Joon-ho, known for “Parasite” and “Snowpiercer“.
It stars Robert Pattinson and Mark Ruffalo.
The film is distributed by Warner Brothers.
The movie is based on the novel “Mickey7” by Edward Ashton.
In China, the film is released under the title “Bon Hoa (ç·¨è) 17“.
China and Korean Cultural Imports
What is “Hanryeong” and how does it affect Korean cultural imports in China?
“Hanryeong” (ííë ¹), also known as the Korean Wave Ban, is an unofficial ban on Korean cultural imports in China.
It was implemented following South Korea’s deployment of the THAAD missile defense system.
The ban has restricted the import of Korean dramas, films, and music into China.
Is the release of Mickey17 a sign that the “Hanryeong” is being lifted?
Potentially, but with cautious anticipation. While some observers see the premiere of “Mickey17” as a sign of easing restrictions on Korean content, especially as it’s directed by Bong Joon-ho; industry sources indicate that the situation is complex.
Some suggest the film’s release, being a U.S. production, might alleviate concerns about re-releasing Korean films in China.
The premiere is viewed as a possible step toward resuming cultural exchange.
However, there’s no official directive from the Chinese government regarding the lifting of “Hanryeong.”
What is the current stance of the Chinese government regarding Korean cultural imports?
The Chinese government’s stance remains unclear.
Premier Li Qiang mentioned “attracting foreign investment through cultural openness with quality” at the National People’s Congress.
It’s uncertain whether this includes Korean popular culture.
Emphasis on “quality” suggests a potential reopening,but restrictions like limitations on direct interactions between Korean celebrities and Chinese fans might persist.
Foreign importers are reviewing Korean films, but are not making concrete purchase offers, suggesting uncertainty.
Beyond Mickey17, what other foreign films are slated for release in china?
Several American blockbusters and animated films are also scheduled for release:
Wonder woman 4
Captain America: Brave New World
Kung Fu Panda 4
Inside Out 2
Impact and Perspectives
Why is the release of Mickey17 in China notable?
It marks Bong Joon-ho’s first new film in six years, as “Parasite“.
It revives discussions around cultural exchange between China and South Korea.
Some Chinese film enthusiasts have eagerly awaited Bong Joon-ho’s new movie and would like to see “Parasite” re-released in China.
How is Mickey17 perceived in China?
it is indeed viewed in two ways:
As a “Bong Joon-ho film,” recognizing the director’s influence and prestige.
As a “hollywood movie,” given its U.S. production and distribution.
What are the expert opinions on the situation?
Lee Guk-bong (Institute for Far Eastern Studies): Believes Bong Joon-ho’s representation of Korea likely factored into the import permission process, aiming to expand Korea-China cultural exchange.
**