89-Yr-Outdated Man Sentenced to Life for Stabbing His Second Spouse in Thiruvananthapuram: Surprising Particulars of the Homicide Case

Balanandan stabbed Jagadamma to dying in entrance of her daughter by his first spouse. The homicide befell on December 22, 2022 at 3:15 PM. The statements of Soumya, daughter of Balanandan’s first spouse, and neighbors have been additionally recorded by the CCTV cameras of the identical home. The CCTV footage is the clinching proof within the case.

Accused Balanandan was a toll collector. His first spouse Kamalamma had kids Soumya, Jayachandran and Latha. Jagadamma, who was killed when he had his first spouse, was saved in the home as a second spouse. His first spouse died two years in the past.

From then on, his solely daughter Soumya and his second spouse Jagadamma lived in the home with Balanandan. When Jayachandran and Lata, the youngsters of his first spouse, returned residence, Jagadamma entertained them. However Balanandan objected. There was a quarrel with Jagadamma and Balanandan over this. Jagadamma Jayachandran and Lata, who had no kids, have been stabbed to dying with a knife whereas his daughter Soumya, neighbors and family Krishnaraj, Latika and Lekharaj watched.

Soumya’s husband was killed with a knife introduced from the Gulf. The accused stabbed Jagadamma 5 occasions within the coronary heart, abdomen and liver. Following the incident, Thiruvallam police arrived and took Jagadamma, who was mendacity on the bottom, to the Medical School Hospital. By then, Jagadamma was lifeless.

The accused was tried in judicial custody; The family weren’t able to pay the bail

The accused Balanandan was 87 years outdated on the time of the homicide. The Thiruvallam police arrested the accused on the day of the incident. The accused was then produced in court docket and was remanded in judicial custody on the Thiruvananthapuram Central Jail. The trial was performed whereas the accused was in judicial custody on the Central Jail. The family of the accused didn’t come to put up bail even as soon as whereas he was in judicial custody.

After the decision listening to, the defendant is secure

The court docket sentenced the accused to life imprisonment and a advantageous of fifty thousand rupees. Following the decision, the accused’s lawyer requested for leniency within the sentence. The defence lawyer requested for a discount within the sentence contemplating the accused’s age and imaginative and prescient issues.

However in response to Part 10 of the Penal Code, if the accused is male, age shouldn’t be considered, stated Public Prosecutor Parashala A. Aji Kumar argued. After listening to the decision, the accused merely stood earlier than the court docket. Earlier in the course of the trial, the accused had confessed to the crime and stated it was dedicated beneath these circumstances. If the accused fails to pay the advantageous of fifty thousand rupees, Further District Decide AM Basheer dominated.

4 eyewitnesses; 20 witnesses

4 eyewitnesses and 20 witnesses have been examined by the prosecution. The accused’s daughter Soumya and neighbours Krishnaraj, Latika and Lekharaj have been current as eyewitnesses. Their statements have been essential within the case. Aside from these, 20 extra witnesses have been additionally examined. This contains Sivankutty, son of the accused’s first spouse Kamalamma.

Aside from this, CCTV cameras have been current in the home of the accused on the time of the homicide. The court docket additionally thought of the footage as proof. 32 paperwork and 18 gadgets associated to the case have been produced within the court docket. Thiruvallam Police Inspector Rahul Ravindran investigated the case and filed the chargesheet within the court docket. Public Prosecutor Parassala A. for the prosecution. Ajikumar appeared. Senior Civil Police Officer Sreekala additionally labored as a liaison officer with the court docket. The prosecution examined 24 witnesses. 32 paperwork and 18 gadgets associated to the case have been produced within the court docket.