9th Circuit Judge: Trump’s Portland Military Invasion Unconstitutional
This is a passionate and critical commentary on the deployment of federal troops in Portland, Oregon. Here’s a breakdown of the key points and arguments:
* Lack of Justification: The author argues that the government hasn’t adequately demonstrated the harm it would suffer if the deployment were stayed while the courts consider further evidence. In contrast, the potential harm to the people of Portland is “pretty fucking clear.”
* City of Portland’s Interest: The author cites the City of Portland’s interest in preserving peace and the potential economic harm to local businesses as reasons to oppose the deployment.
* Judge Graber’s Dissent: The author highlights Judge Graber’s strong dissent, emphasizing her concerns about the anti-American nature of the deployment and the potential for abuse of power.
* Abuse of Power: Judge Graber’s argument is that the president is invoking emergency authority in a situation that doesn’t warrant it,exceeding the limits set by Congress.
* hypocrisy: The author accuses supporters of the deployment (specifically the “MAGA crowd”) of hypocrisy, pointing out that they would likely object vehemently if a Democratic president used similar tactics for different purposes.The author references the Jade Helm 15 conspiracy theory as an example of past paranoia about military overreach.
* Call to Action: The author concludes with a call to action, urging those dismayed by the situation to fight for the rule of law and to hold the government accountable.
In essence, the author is arguing that the deployment of federal troops in Portland is an overreach of executive power, a violation of constitutional principles, and a dangerous precedent that could be exploited by future administrations.