Home » Sports » Rugby Tackle Height Law: Impact on the Game

Rugby Tackle Height Law: Impact on the Game

by David Thompson - Sports Editor

following world‌ RugbyS ​declaration⁢ of an ‌elite ‍level ‌trial for a lowered tackle height, we explain what the new guidance ⁣means‌ for the sport

Since july 2023, english community rugby players ⁤have been expected to⁢ tackle below the base of the sternum. ‍This change ⁤is ⁢in line with​ most unions around the globe, since ‍ World ⁣Rugby recommended a global trial of the “belly tackle” outside ‍elite level in an effort to reduce head impacts and ⁣concussions.

The​ governing body⁣ has since announced that the tackle height trial will be introduced at‌ elite level for the first time, at the World rugby ⁤U20 Championship taking place in ⁤Georgia this year.

But what does this mean for players,coaches,referees,and the watching public?

Why lower‌ tackle ​height?

Its primarily in the ​name ‌of player safety. World Rugby claims that “trials over the‍ last two seasons⁢ involving 11 unions⁤ around the world have shown that ‌a lower legal tackle height has​ changed ‍player behavior⁤ and⁣ some unions⁢ have reported a reduction in in concussion rates, albeit over a single season to date.”

The ⁤governing body also says‍ that there has been “up to a 10 per cent reduction in the number of upright tackles” in the community game since the tackle height was lowered.‍ It is indeed subsequently recommending that the World Rugby Council make the tackle height guidelines⁣ full law⁢ at ‍community level from ​July 2026.

The ‍U20 Championships have been chosen ‍as a ‍test bed because a single competition can⁤ act ⁣as a handy⁢ Petri dish for new laws.

“[this trial] allows for teams to properly prepare to play under ⁤the amended laws,” says World Rugby. “Referees will have time to focus on ensuring law is practically applied and players will ​not be expected to move between different law environments, ⁣which ‍has proved a concern in the past.”

where do ⁤the new rules apply?

As well‍ as making their elite debut ‍in the 2026 World Rugby‌ U20 Championship ⁣in Georgia, the rules currently apply below professional​ level ⁢in most countries.

In​ England, that’s National One down in the men’s game‌ and Championship One down in the women’s game – in other words, ⁣players in clubs, schools, colleges, universities and throughout the community game, at both​ adult and age​ grade levels, have ​to make their tackles below the‍ sternum. Coaches and ⁣players have thus‌ needed to⁤ adjust‍ their approach to‌ tackle training.

Every country’s union will⁢ interpret‍ tackle‍ height directives slightly differently,⁢ with the English game having its⁢ own domestic law variation (DLV).

Will these⁣ rules end ⁣up in the​ professional game?

That⁣ depends on the outcomes of the various‌ trials, and also consultations‌ between World⁢ Rugby, individual unions,⁢ fans and medical professionals. As‌ well as player welfare, the character ​of the ⁢sport will be factored into any decisions.

“world Rugby ‌has⁢ always said that when it comes to ​player welfare⁢ we’ll prot

will help​ us work out the ⁤level of danger.

A passive tackle, ⁤which‌ is one where​ the⁢ tackler accepts ⁢the ball carrier’s momentum, is unlikely‍ to be high danger. If⁤ there ​is a head space invasion, it might just be a penalty, especially ​if the tackler⁤ was at least trying‌ to get ⁤lower.

A more​ aggressive tackle is ⁤likelier to be yellow-carded if there ⁢is a ‌head space invasion –‌ if the shoulder will impact above the sternum, the⁣ heads are too close together.

The height of the ball carrier

The RFU ⁢considers the height of the ball carrier to be a potential act of foul⁣ play. A ball carrier dipping “low⁣ and late” into a tackle, ‍leading ‌to a head-on-head or shoulder-on-head contact, is considered a danger flag to the⁢ referee.

However, ‍if ⁤the⁤ ball⁢ carrier moves from‌ the back of the⁣ ruck (pick and ⁢go), this isn’t regarded as a dangerous dip⁣ because the speed is ‌very low.

A ball carrier in open play⁤ who dips late ⁤as they are running, thus making a tackler’s job‌ almost unachievable,⁢ coudl be penalised. That said, it will be ⁢fine ⁢if they⁤ slow up and​ brace for contact – after all, ‍this is hardly a‌ dip⁣ to move forward.

There may be rare cases of increased speed increasing danger while⁣ attempting ‌to score a⁤ try, but ball carriers tend not to dive into a⁢ defender, aiming instead⁤ to get to get to ⁢the side. Diving and dipping for the try line are⁢ not penalised.

It looks ‌like‌ the ball carrier (white) has ​dipped, so the punishment for the left-hand tackle⁤ is unlikely to be worse than a‌ penalty. If the ball carrier had been running with any pace ⁢and⁤ dipped, then a penalty might be awarded to the ⁣defense.

Bending

The tackler must be bending.⁢ Bending ⁤happens in two‍ obvious places: the hips and‍ the knees.

The referee will be ⁤looking​ at the angle of‍ those ⁢hips and⁤ shoulders –‌ the more upright the tackler,​ the ⁤less ​likely​ the bend.

A tackler racing off⁣ the line will ⁣find it⁤ hard​ to bend,so looking at the pace of the tackler​ again helps us to decide where problems might arise.

The​ most likely dangerous tackles ⁣from a height perspective come from the front ⁢or front/side (fried!) tackles.​ Side-on or rear tackles might end ⁣up‍ “high”, but⁤ in most cases these ‍will be penalties at worst, because the tackler is chasing the ball ⁢carrier, not meeting them.

The tackler (in white) is ‍pretty upright. ‍This looks like a penalty, at​ least, and ⁢if the tackle was dominant, then we might be‌ looking at a yellow card.

The ⁤second tackler

In England,you are still allowed multiple tacklers per ball⁣ carrier. The laws apply⁤ equally. though, it is indeed​ still possible to rip the ball from the ball carrier. It ​won’t be considered a ​tackle, though,⁤ as the ripper won’t be impacting with their shoulder.

The⁤ lower blue tackler‍ has made a ‌tackle,‍ and the second blue ⁤tackler is looking to rip the ball. if‌ they​ had driven into the ball carrier, ⁣then it ⁣might ​very well be tackle, then rip, so a possible penalty.

England Rugby tackle height framework

This is England Rugby’s tackle height framework. You can ‌see from the⁤ flow⁢ chart that mitigating ⁢factors are mostly dictated by the pace ‍of either the tackler or the ‍ball carrier.

Credit: RFU

Read more:


You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.