“`html
The increasing deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models across critical sectors necessitates rigorous validation, both from a scientific and operational perspective. This validation ensures reliability, safety, and ethical considerations are addressed before and during implementation.
AI Risk Management Framework (RMF)
Table of Contents
The AI Risk Management Framework,developed by the National institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),provides guidance for organizations to manage risks to individuals,organizations,and society associated with AI.
Detail: The RMF is designed to be flexible and adaptable, recognizing that AI systems vary widely in their capabilities, applications, and potential impacts. It focuses on four key functions: Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage. These functions help organizations identify, assess, and mitigate AI-related risks throughout the AI lifecycle.
Example or Evidence: NIST published version 1.0 of the AI RMF on January 26, 2023, outlining specific actions organizations can take to address AI risks. NIST AI RMF 1.0 Release
AI/ML in Medical Devices
The Food and Drug administration (FDA) is actively developing a regulatory framework for AI and Machine Learning (ML)-enabled medical devices, focusing on ensuring patient safety and effectiveness.
Detail: Traditional medical device regulation frequently enough struggles to accommodate the adaptive nature of AI/ML algorithms, which can change over time based on new data.The FDA is exploring pre-certification approaches and real-world performance monitoring to address these challenges. The FDA’s approach emphasizes Total Product Lifecycle (TPLC) considerations.
Example or Evidence: In September 2023, the FDA released a draft guidance outlining its proposed approach to regulating AI/ML-based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD). FDA Draft Guidance on AI/ML SaMD. This guidance details expectations for pre-submission interactions with the FDA.
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and AI
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is focused on ensuring that AI systems are fair,obvious,and do not discriminate against consumers,leveraging its existing authorities to address potential harms.
Detail: The FTC is particularly concerned with algorithmic bias and deceptive practices related to AI. It is actively investigating companies that make false or unsubstantiated claims about their AI products and services. The FTC’s focus is on protecting consumers from unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the marketplace.
Example or Evidence: In May 2023, the FTC announced a policy statement regarding the use of AI and algorithmic tools, emphasizing that companies are accountable for the harms caused by their AI systems, even if those harms are unintentional. FTC Policy Statement on AI. The FTC also held a public workshop on AI in November 2023.
Department of Defense (DoD) Responsible AI
The Department of Defense (DoD) has established Responsible AI (RAI) guiding principles to ensure the ethical and effective use of AI in military applications.
Detail: The DoD’s RAI principles emphasize fairness, accountability, explainability, and traceability. These principles are intended to guide the development and deployment of AI systems that are aligned with U.S. values and legal obligations.The DoD Directive 3000.09 formally establishes RAI policies.
Example or Evidence: The DoD adopted its RAI principles in February 2020,outlining a framework for responsible AI development and deployment. DoD responsible AI Guiding Principles. these principles are being integrated into DoD acquisition processes and AI development programs.
