New documents suggest that Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, shared confidential UK government briefings with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, including details about potential investment opportunities in Afghanistan. The revelations, stemming from the latest release of Epstein files by the US Justice Department, are prompting scrutiny and a police assessment in the UK.
The files indicate that as UK trade envoy, Andrew passed along reports from official visits to Singapore, Hong Kong, China, and Vietnam to Epstein in 2010 and 2011. This occurred despite official guidance stipulating that trade envoys maintain confidentiality regarding sensitive commercial or political information gathered during their official duties. On October 7, 2010, Andrew reportedly emailed Epstein details of upcoming official trips, and subsequently forwarded official visit reports, prepared by his special assistant Amit Patel, to Epstein on November 30th, just minutes after receiving them himself.
Perhaps most concerning is a briefing shared on Christmas Eve 2010, detailing investment opportunities in the reconstruction of Helmand Province, Afghanistan. This region was, at the time, overseen by British armed forces and funded by UK government money. The document reportedly included information on potential investments in gold and other resources. This occurred after Epstein had already been convicted of sex offenses.
The timing of these communications is particularly sensitive. Andrew had previously stated, in a 2019 interview with BBC Newsnight, that his last meeting with Epstein was in New York in December 2010, where he informed Epstein he was ending their friendship. However, the Christmas Eve email suggests continued contact and the sharing of sensitive information even after this alleged break.
The revelations have prompted a response from British authorities. Graham Smith, chief executive of the anti-monarchist group Republic, has reported Andrew to police for suspected misconduct in public office and breach of the Official Secrets Act. Thames Valley Police have confirmed they have received the report and are assessing the information.
Buckingham Palace has stated that King Charles stands ready to support the police investigation. A spokesperson for the palace emphasized the King’s “profound concern at allegations which continue to come to light” regarding Andrew’s conduct, adding that the palace would cooperate with authorities if approached. King Charles has previously signaled his concern regarding the ongoing allegations surrounding his brother.
Sir Vince Cable, who served as Business Secretary during the period in question, expressed surprise at the reports. He stated he was unaware of Andrew sharing information about investment opportunities, telling the BBC, “What we have is the first I’ve heard of it.”
Andrew has consistently denied any wrongdoing in connection with his association with Epstein. However, the newly released files add to a growing body of evidence raising questions about the nature of their relationship and whether Andrew acted appropriately while serving as a trade envoy. The files also suggest Andrew may have sought Epstein’s business expertise, rather than simply distancing himself from the financier.
The role of a UK trade envoy carries a significant responsibility to protect sensitive information. Official guidance clearly outlines the duty of confidentiality regarding commercial and political matters discussed during official visits. The allegations suggest a potential breach of this duty, raising questions about national security and the integrity of the trade envoy program.
The ongoing scrutiny of Andrew’s ties to Epstein continues to cast a shadow over the British Royal Family. The release of these files, and the subsequent police investigation, represent a new chapter in a scandal that has already damaged the monarchy’s reputation. The outcome of the police assessment will likely determine whether further action will be taken against the former Prince.
The implications of this situation extend beyond the immediate legal ramifications. The revelations raise broader questions about the vetting process for trade envoys and the safeguards in place to prevent the sharing of confidential information with individuals who may pose a risk. The incident is likely to fuel calls for greater transparency and accountability within the Royal Family and the government.
