The threat of state-sponsored assassination hangs over a growing number of Russian journalists and dissidents living in exile, a reality brought into sharp focus by the recent death of Alexei Navalny. Roman Dobrokhotov, editor-in-chief of The Insider, a Russian investigative journalism outlet, has been living under the shadow of a Kremlin kill list since fleeing Russia in .
Dobrokhotov’s exile began with a clandestine journey through the forests, a desperate attempt to escape the increasingly repressive atmosphere under President Vladimir Putin. His work, which has exposed the inner workings of Russian intelligence operations, particularly those linked to the use of nerve agents, made him a prime target. He revealed the identities of Russian agents involved in the poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Salisbury, England, and later helped uncover details surrounding the poisoning of Alexei Navalny.
The repercussions of his reporting extended beyond Russia’s borders. While in the United Kingdom, Dobrokhotov became the target of a Putin-linked spy ring operating in London and Great Yarmouth. Court proceedings revealed discussions among members of the ring about potential methods of assassination, ranging from the use of ricin and the nerve agent VX to more brutal options like arson and acid attacks. Despite the conviction and lengthy prison sentences – a total of 50 years – handed down to six members of the group, Dobrokhotov remains deeply concerned for his safety.
The level of precaution Dobrokhotov now takes in his daily life is indicative of the constant danger he faces. He avoids touching door handles with bare hands, a simple act transformed into a calculated risk. This isn’t merely paranoia; it’s a pragmatic response to a credible threat, underscored by the UK’s confirmation that Navalny was poisoned with a deadly frog toxin.
Dobrokhotov’s case is not isolated. Other Russian journalists and activists have also sought refuge abroad, facing similar threats. , Russian journalist Ekaterina Barabash, who publicly criticised the war in Ukraine, was reported to be living in exile in Paris, having also fled through the forests with the assistance of non-governmental organizations. This highlights a pattern of repression and the lengths to which the Kremlin is willing to go to silence dissent, even beyond its own borders.
The use of poison, particularly nerve agents like Novichok, has become a hallmark of alleged Russian state-sponsored attacks. The Skripal poisoning in brought international attention to this tactic, and the subsequent investigation by The Insider, led by Dobrokhotov, played a crucial role in identifying the perpetrators. The Navalny poisoning further solidified these concerns, leading to widespread condemnation and sanctions.
The implications of these actions extend beyond the immediate victims. They represent a direct assault on freedom of speech and journalistic integrity. The targeting of journalists in exile sends a chilling message to others who might be considering speaking out against the Russian government. It also raises serious questions about the safety and security of dissidents living abroad and the ability of host countries to protect them.
The case of Roman Dobrokhotov underscores the increasingly dangerous environment for independent journalism in Russia and the lengths to which exiled journalists must go to protect themselves. The threat isn’t simply theoretical; it’s a lived reality, shaping every aspect of his life. The continued pursuit of those who challenge the Kremlin, even across international borders, demonstrates a willingness to disregard international norms and the rule of law.
While the jailing of the Bulgarian spy ring offers a degree of reassurance, Dobrokhotov remains convinced that Russia’s efforts to silence him have not ceased. The Kremlin’s track record suggests a persistent and ruthless approach to eliminating perceived enemies, making the lives of exiled journalists a constant struggle for survival. The international community faces a growing challenge in protecting these individuals and upholding the principles of free expression in the face of increasingly aggressive state-sponsored intimidation.
