Home » Business » US LNG to Europe: Despite Trump, Trade Continues

US LNG to Europe: Despite Trump, Trade Continues

by Ahmed Hassan - World News Editor

European Reliance on US LNG Persists Despite Trade Tensions

Despite escalating trade tensions and a recent pause in ratification of a key trade deal, European officials and industry executives remain confident that the continent will continue to rely heavily on U.S. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies. This assurance comes even as the European Union explores alternative suppliers in response to increasingly unpredictable U.S. Trade policy under President Donald Trump.

The resilience of the U.S.-European LNG partnership was a key theme at an industry event in Washington , marking a decade since the first American LNG cargo was shipped. The event took place against a backdrop of growing uncertainty following Trump’s recent imposition of a universal 10% tariff on all imports, with a potential increase to 15%, and his past threats regarding Greenland.

EU Ambassador to the U.S., Jovita Neliupšienė, stated that the partnership “will probably see that it will evolve, but it will not fade.” This sentiment reflects a pragmatic assessment of Europe’s energy needs and the current limitations of diversifying away from U.S. Supplies, despite political friction.

Trade Deal in Limbo

The European Parliament paused work on ratifying a new trade deal with the U.S., a move directly linked to Trump’s recent tariff actions. The deal, signed last summer, included a commitment from Europe to purchase $750 billion in American energy. This suspension underscores the growing frustration in Europe over what is perceived as a breach of the agreement’s terms, as highlighted by Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament’s international trade committee. Lange told CNBC that the U.S. Government has “really made a breach of this deal several times.”

The pause in ratification doesn’t immediately halt existing LNG flows, but it casts a shadow over future energy commitments and signals a willingness from the EU to leverage trade policy in response to U.S. Actions. The EU is prepared to retaliate if necessary, according to Lange.

US Energy Dominance Strategy

The U.S. Has strategically positioned itself as a key energy supplier to Europe, particularly following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in . European nations sought alternatives to Russian pipeline gas, and the U.S. Stepped in to fill the gap with LNG. According to data from , the U.S. Accounted for 59% of LNG imports to the EU. This shift in reliance has been actively encouraged by the Trump administration, which has pushed for increased U.S. Energy exports as part of its broader strategy of “energy dominance.”

The U.S. National Energy Dominance Council is scheduled to host a closed-door conference with diplomats from Eastern and Central European countries, and U.S. LNG companies. The aim is to secure new gas supply deals, demonstrating the continued U.S. Commitment to expanding its energy footprint in Europe.

Europe’s Limited Alternatives

While EU Energy Commissioner Dan Jørgensen recently indicated the bloc is seeking alternative suppliers, the reality is that rapidly replacing U.S. LNG volumes is challenging. Europe’s infrastructure is increasingly geared towards receiving LNG, and the U.S. Has invested heavily in LNG export facilities. The transition away from Russian gas created a significant logistical undertaking, and switching suppliers again would require substantial investment and time.

The reliance on U.S. LNG also creates a complex geopolitical dynamic. As noted in analysis by the Clingendael Institute, the Ecologic Institute, and the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Europe has effectively swapped dependence on Russia for dependence on the U.S. This shift carries risks, particularly given Trump’s willingness to use trade policy as a tool to achieve broader political objectives, such as his recent pursuit of acquiring Greenland.

Long-Term Contracts and Political Considerations

The increase in U.S. Fossil fuel imports to Europe wasn’t solely a result of market forces. Individual European member states and energy companies entered into long-term contracts with American partners, and political decisions, such as the agreement reached between European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and former U.S. President Joe Biden in , to increase U.S. Supplies, played a significant role.

Despite the current tensions, the fundamental economic drivers supporting the U.S.-European LNG trade remain strong. Europe needs reliable energy supplies, and the U.S. Has the capacity to provide them. However, the long-term stability of the relationship will depend on the ability of both sides to navigate the unpredictable policy landscape created by President Trump and address concerns about energy security and geopolitical leverage.

The situation is further complicated by the fact that the U.S. Is now a major supplier of both LNG and crude oil to Europe. In , the U.S. Ranked second, after Norway, as the most important supplier of crude oil to the EU. This broad energy dependence amplifies the potential impact of any further trade disputes or policy shifts.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.