Eddie Jones: Henry Pollock Similar to Springbok Bobby Skinstad
- London – Former England head coach Eddie Jones has questioned a tactical decision made by his successor, Steve Borthwick, during England’s recent 42-21 defeat to Ireland in the...
- Pollock, who earned his first seven caps as a substitute, was making his first Test start at No.
- Speaking on the Rugby Unity podcast, Jones drew a comparison between Pollock and 2007 Rugby World Cup winner Bobby Skinstad, a former Springbok loose forward.
London – Former England head coach Eddie Jones has questioned a tactical decision made by his successor, Steve Borthwick, during England’s recent 42-21 defeat to Ireland in the Guinness Six Nations. Jones specifically criticized the starting of 21-year-old back-rower Henry Pollock, suggesting the young Saint isn’t built for the relentless physicality required of a full 80-minute performance in the back row.
Pollock, who earned his first seven caps as a substitute, was making his first Test start at No. 8 at Twickenham’s Allianz Stadium on . While he showed flashes of potential – a half-break in the first half and a burst down the right flank in the second – he was largely neutralized by a dominant Irish side that controlled the breakdown.
Speaking on the Rugby Unity podcast, Jones drew a comparison between Pollock and 2007 Rugby World Cup winner Bobby Skinstad, a former Springbok loose forward. “Starting Pollock – to me he’s like Bobby Skinstad,” Jones said. “Good looking, always got a sun tan and can play. But he’s one of those blokes who plays for 20 minutes. He finds himself in the right position but he’s not a grind player.”
Jones elaborated, explaining that the demands of a full match in the back row require a different skillset. “To play a full 80 in the back row, you’ve got to be prepared to grind, and maybe that’s not the best job for him.” The implication is that Pollock’s talents are better suited to impactful appearances off the bench, providing energy and a spark when opponents are fatigued.
The criticism comes as Borthwick opted to start Pollock ahead of Sam Underhill, who had started England’s opening two matches of the Six Nations. Underhill was subsequently introduced as a substitute against Ireland and made an impact, scoring a try. Jones’ comments suggest he believes Underhill’s more abrasive, physical style is better suited to the demands of a starting role.
Former Wallabies coach Ewen McKenzie echoed Jones’ assessment, highlighting the importance of physicality in the early stages of a match. “You need players who can mix it physically early on and earn the right to play,” McKenzie said. “England never got that and were forced to operate on the back foot.” This suggests that the lack of a consistently physical presence in the back row contributed to England’s struggles at the breakdown and overall dominance by Ireland.
The defeat to Ireland was a comprehensive one for England, leaving them with significant ground to make up in the Six Nations championship. The decision to start Pollock, and the subsequent performance, will undoubtedly be scrutinized as Borthwick seeks to find the right balance and combinations within his squad. Jones’ comments add another layer of analysis to the situation, raising questions about the best way to utilize Pollock’s talents and the overall tactical approach of the England team.
The comparison to Bobby Skinstad is particularly insightful. Skinstad, while a gifted player and a World Cup winner, was often criticized for lacking the consistent physicality required to dominate at the highest level for extended periods. He was known for his explosive runs and offloading ability, but also for periods of anonymity. Jones’ suggestion that Pollock shares similar characteristics raises concerns about his suitability for a starting role in a demanding international environment.
While Pollock’s potential is undeniable, Jones’ assessment highlights the importance of understanding a player’s strengths and weaknesses and deploying them accordingly. The challenge for Borthwick will be to find the right role for Pollock within the England setup, maximizing his impact while mitigating his limitations. Whether that means utilizing him as a dynamic impact substitute or continuing to experiment with him in a starting position remains to be seen.
The situation also underscores the ongoing debate about the evolving role of the modern back-rower. While physicality and breakdown work remain crucial, there is also a growing emphasis on ball-carrying, passing skills, and tactical awareness. Pollock appears to possess the latter qualities, but Jones’ comments suggest he may lack the former, at least at this stage of his career.
England’s next match in the Six Nations will be a crucial one, as they look to bounce back from the defeat to Ireland. Borthwick will need to carefully consider his team selection and tactical approach, taking into account the lessons learned from the Twickenham loss and the insights offered by experienced coaches like Eddie Jones.
