Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Acquittal in High-Profile Case: Former Prosecutor’s Office Employee Cleared of Charges in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Acquittal in High-Profile Case: Former Prosecutor’s Office Employee Cleared of Charges in Bosnia and Herzegovina

September 7, 2024 Catherine Williams - Chief Editor News

Former Prosecutor’s Office Employee’s Indictment Rejected

The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina has rejected‍ the indictment against Mustafa Vrapac, a former employee of‌ the Prosecutor’s Office in Bosnia ‌and ​Herzegovina, in ‌a first instance verdict.

The verdict established that the actions of the accused do not ⁤include any of the crimes for which he was⁣ charged, and⁣ that those crimes that could be charged against him are not within the jurisdiction ⁤of‍ the Court of Bosnia and⁤ Herzegovina.

The court, as⁣ the Defense claimed, concluded that the element⁢ of ‌official position or influence was missing for the‍ crimes of “forging an official document”⁢ and “receiving a ‍reward or other form of ⁣benefit for trading in‌ influence”.

Key Points of the Verdict

  • The defense did not disagree with the events⁢ from the indictment, but debated whether​ other criminal acts could be found for which the Court is not competent.
  • According ⁢to the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina (CC BiH), ⁢the‍ crime of “forging‌ an official document” can only⁢ be committed by⁤ an officer or a responsible ‍person exercising his official authority.
  • The tasks described in Vrapac’s authorizations as head of the Department of General Affairs cannot be considered⁤ as authorizations that could be included in the act of “forging an official⁢ document” prescribed by the Bosnian‍ Criminal Code and Herzegovina.

Impersonation and Influence

The court found‍ that the actions taken by the accused could be⁤ classified as fraud ​under the FBiH CC, as he mispresented‍ himself and created ⁣the impression that ⁢he had influence which he did not have.

The Council examined whether Vrapac’s actions were described ⁤by some⁤ other law for‍ which the Court ⁤of Bosnia and Herzegovina has jurisdiction, but decided that they were not.

The prosecution should⁣ take steps to have the case heard before another competent court.

Background⁤ of the Case

According to the‌ indictment, Vrapac forged ‍the ⁤official identification of this organization on the website​ of the Prosecutor’s Office and used it to present ‌himself as an officer without authorization.

He contacted one person ​at the end of‍ 2022 and the‌ beginning of 2023 and demanded‌ and received 20,000 KM from her in order to ⁢allegedly mediate​ with the prosecutor⁢ not to ​carry out ‌certain ⁣actions.

An appeal is allowed to the Appeals Council of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

Bosnia and Herzegovina, Corruption

Search:

News Directory 3

ByoDirectory is a comprehensive directory of businesses and services across the United States. Find what you need, when you need it.

Quick Links

  • Copyright Notice
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

Connect With Us

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service