Alexandra Rosenfeld: Jean Imbert Criticism & Violence Reveal

Last April in the magazine “Elle”, four ex-conjointes by Jean Imbert accused the chef of behavior relating to psychological violence, and sometimes physical. One of them, which remained anonymous and called Éléonore in the article, revealed: “He struck me in the head. I had an broken nose. ” “I’m not Eleonore, I’m Alexandra. And now I’m talking, ”writes Alexandra Rosenfeld on her Instagram account, Tuesday, August 19, 2025.

The ex-Miss France chose to publicly testify four months later. And if she does not name the one she accuses, the information she gives is enough to understand who she is talking about.

The first image of its publication is the photograph of a medical report. “Trauma by direct shock”, we read. “Result: fracture of clean bones of the nose.”

“More than ten years ago, I was with someone. He put me a whim, once, begins Alexandra Rosenfeld. But strangely, that’s not what marked me. What damaged me was all that was around. ” She speaks of “contempt”, “abundant”, “silences”, “grip”. “I stayed. Because I loved it, ”she explains. It was when he turned to another that it stopped. “I was no longer used for anything. He finally let me leave. “

She then tried to talk about her about what had happened. In front of the looks that closed, she chose to be silent. Then forgiven him. “I forgive myself,” she adds.

Ten years later, she agreed to testify with three other women in “Elle”. “Not out of revenge”, but “for us”, she says about “those who have become friends”. About the fractured nose, Jean Imbert explained after the publication of the article that it was a defensive reaction during a physical argument. According to him, he had “cleared”. “What he answered is false,” retorts Alexandra Rosenfeld, Tuesday, August 19.

The ex-Miss stresses that “there is no complaint, no trial, it was over ten years ago and even if I still have this radio (Editor’s note: that of his broken nose)what has damaged us is not seen, so how to judge it … “

In its publication, the thirty -something anticipates the questions: “Why are they talking now?” Why did they stay? Does she want to stand out? ” “I speak now because I took a long time to heal. I stayed because I was under control. And I’m not looking for anything to gain-just peace and agree with myself. ”

Under its publication, the messages of support flock.