arXiv Imposes Submission Limits Following Record 40,363 Submissions

The open-access research repository arXiv has implemented new submission limits following a period of record-breaking growth. As of 1 October 2026, authors are restricted to two submissions per calendar month, with a cap of no more than three active submissions at any single time. This policy shift follows a surge in volume that saw the platform receive 40,363 submissions in September 2026, nearly double the 20,569 recorded in September 2024, Research Information reported.

Limits Imposed on Submission Frequency

The new rate-limiting policy serves as an interim measure while arXiv evaluates the impact of increasingly sophisticated artificial intelligence tools on scholarly communication. The repository stated that the change is intended to provide staff time to improve moderation procedures. According to the organization, the influx of submissions has significantly strained its manual review processes, generating approximately 9,000 support tickets for moderators and staff during the month of September 2026 alone.

Growth Driven by Artificial Intelligence Tools

The scale of growth on the platform has accelerated over the past decade. In September 2016, arXiv processed 9,869 submissions, a figure that climbed to 20,569 by September 2024 before reaching the current record of 40,363. Growth has been particularly concentrated in specific disciplines; submissions to the Computer Science Artificial Intelligence category, cs.AI, have increased more than sixfold over the last two years, while other categories have doubled in volume during the same timeframe.

arXiv attributes part of this surge to the widespread adoption of AI tools, which have made the production and communication of research faster. While the repository continues to permit the use of AI in research, it requires that such use be disclosed and that all submissions meet established standards for scholarly interest. However, arXiv reported that an increasing number of submissions are failing to satisfy these criteria.

AI Tools Increase Volume of Low-Value Submissions

Moderators have observed a rise in specific types of content that consume disproportionate amounts of time. These include thin papers with narrow scopes, salami papers—where a single research project is fragmented into multiple smaller submissions—and an increase in dense, AI-generated manuscripts. The repository noted that these tools have lowered the barrier for authors to submit large volumes of low-value work.

The heart of arXiv’s process for detecting and rejecting low-quality papers is our many volunteer moderators. We are so grateful that they donate their time and expertise every day. However, a relatively small proportion of authors are submitting a large number of low-quality papers and consuming a disproportionate fraction of the moderators’ time. This is unfair to authors who continue to submit quality papers – their papers can be delayed for days or weeks as a result.

Thomas Dietterich, Chair of the arXiv Editorial Advisory Council

Future Practices for Scholarly Research

The new submission limits are intended to distribute the workload of volunteer moderators more equitably across the author base. arXiv described the policy as a stopgap measure, intended to protect the repository’s corpus from inappropriate submissions while the organization determines best practices for an era of advanced AI-assisted research. The repository continues to improve its internal tools and procedures to address how academic publishing is changing.