Throughout modern history, predictions of liberal democracy’s decline have surfaced during periods of meaningful global change. Similar anxieties arose in the 1930s with the rise of fascist regimes in Europe, wich were initially perceived as more effective and decisive.
Later, the economic successes of East Asian economies employing elements of state capitalism - specifically Hong Kong, South Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan – often collectively referred to as the “Four Asian Tigers,” challenged the perceived dominance of democratic models. These economies demonstrated rapid growth under systems that prioritized state intervention and long-term planning.
more recently, the economic rise of China, with its distinct political system, has again prompted questions about the relative merits of authoritarianism versus democracy. The perceived ability of authoritarian leaders to implement policies quickly and decisively,even if lacking in broad consensus,is often presented as an advantage. As of January 21, 2026, this debate continues, with ongoing analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of both systems. Freedom House’s annual “Freedom in the World” report consistently highlights the challenges faced by democracies globally, while also documenting the internal pressures and vulnerabilities within authoritarian regimes.
