Mississippi State Auditor Shad White Defends Himself in Brett Favre Defamation Suit

State Auditor Shad White, a Republican known for his criticism of wasteful spending in state government, is using a taxpayer-funded attorney to defend himself in a personal defamation lawsuit brought by NFL Hall of Famer Brett Favre. This legal battle has sparked significant debate and scrutiny, particularly regarding the use of state resources for personal legal matters.

Court records indicate that James Bobo, an attorney from the Office of the State Auditor, has filed numerous legal briefs on behalf of White in the litigation. Favre is suing White in his individual capacity, not in his official capacity as Mississippi’s state auditor. The lawsuit alleges that White defamed Favre in media appearances, claiming that Favre “stealing taxpayer funds” and knowingly misusing funds “designed to serve poor folks.”

White has denied the accusations, unsuccessfully asked a judge to dismiss the complaint, and asserted that his remarks about Favre to the media were truthful. In response to questions from Mississippi Today, Jacob Walters, a spokesperson for White, defended the auditor’s use of the agency attorney in the litigation. Walters said the comments Favre alleges were defamatory concern the state’s sprawling welfare scandal, which White helped uncover as auditor.

“Brett Favre’s lawyers do not get to unilaterally say that his lawsuit is not related to the office. They do not have that power. Auditor White is being sued over statements he made in his official capacity about an audit the office conducted.”

— Jacob Walters, spokesperson for Shad White

However, Hinds County Circuit Judge Debra Gibbs, who is overseeing the case, determined in June that Favre is not suing White in his official capacity. In his official capacity as auditor, White attempted to countersue Favre in the defamation suit and recoup unpaid interest connected to welfare money, which he claims the athlete should be forced to repay. But Judge Gibbs ruled the countersuit improper because neither the state agency nor White, in his official capacity as auditor, was an original party to the litigation.

“Favre did not sue the State of Mississippi and has not alleged that the State of Mississippi defamed him.”

— Judge Debra Gibbs

Despite Gibbs’ ruling that the state was not a party to the lawsuit, White has continued to use an agency attorney in the litigation, even over matters related to his book, “Mississippi Swindle,” which sparked outcry and debate among some state officials. Favre’s legal team in February 2024 filed motions to obtain unpublished book portions, and Bobo in March 2024 filed a motion to quash Favre’s efforts.

White has also listed the book’s proceeds as income on his ethics form, meaning a taxpayer-funded attorney performed legal work related to a book that White personally profited from. White previously told the Magnolia Tribune that lawsuits related to the welfare scandal have cost far more than he’s profited from writing his book, though it’s unclear how much money White has earned from the book sales.

Favre’s legal team has also filed an amended complaint alleging portions of White’s book defamed him, and White’s team, including Bobo, continue to defend him against those claims. State Sen. John Polk, a Republican from Hattiesburg who has recently sparred with the auditor, criticized White’s use of an agency attorney in the lawsuit and said it was improper for him to do so.

“If that can be proven, then he should resign.”

— State Sen. John Polk

Polk also previously criticized White for not getting legislative approval before signing a $2 million contract with Massachusetts-based Boston Consulting Group to determine how state leaders could save money in state government. White’s spokesman responded to Polk’s call for resignation by saying he was unconcerned with what Republican Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann’s “lackey” thinks. Hosemann and White have both said they’re considering running for governor in 2027.

It’s customary for the Attorney General’s Office to defend state agencies and elected officials in their official roles, and they have the discretion to defend them in their personal capacity when it’s relevant to state business. Republican Attorney General Lynn Fitch’s office initially defended White in the lawsuit but withdrew after the office learned that White was planning to publish his book, Mississippi Swindle, chronicling the state’s sprawling welfare scandal.

“Because the book’s publication fell outside the scope of White’s official duties, her office was precluded from representing him in the lawsuit and advised him to retain ‘separate counsel.’”

— Lynn Fitch, Republican Attorney General

In July, White retained Alysson Mills as private counsel to defend him in the lawsuit, but Bobo has continued to represent the auditor alongside Mills. Attorneys for Favre have also questioned the statewide official’s use of state and private attorneys in the lawsuit, calling it an “unheard-of circumstance.”

“And White has not explained how in-house lawyers from the Auditor’s Office may lawfully represent him in this action, in light of the AGO’s determination that it cannot lawfully represent him given that the book’s publication falls outside the scope of his official duties.”

— Favre’s lawyer

As recently as Feb. 12, Bobo filed a subpoena on behalf of White seeking documents. The subpoena asked for documents to be delivered to the State Auditor’s Office in downtown Jackson’s Woolfolk Building and to deliver documents to the attorney’s state government email address.

This legal battle raises important questions about the appropriate use of state resources and the boundaries between official and personal actions of public officials. The case highlights the need for clear guidelines and oversight to ensure that taxpayer-funded resources are used appropriately and that personal legal matters do not blur the lines of official duties.

As the case continues to unfold, it will be crucial for the legal system to provide clarity on these issues, ensuring that public officials are held accountable for their actions and that the integrity of state institutions is maintained. The outcome of this lawsuit could set a precedent for future cases involving the use of state resources for personal legal matters, impacting not only Mississippi but potentially other states grappling with similar issues.

In the broader context, this case serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in balancing transparency, accountability, and the personal rights of public officials. As the legal battle continues, it will be essential for all parties involved to adhere to the principles of fairness, justice, and the rule of law.