Barcelona Defeats Real Madrid 3-2, Wins Spanish Super Cup

PARTITA BLOCCATA

–

Flick was surprised by his colleague’s creativity and Barcelona took almost half an hour to find a way to break through the white bunker. And with two badly wasted counterattacks by Vinicius and Gonzalo, who alone in front of Joan García practically passed him the ball. The game remained blocked until the 36th minute when it exploded and in a quarter of an hour 4 goals arrived, two for each side, and two well after the 3 minutes of recovery initially awarded by the referee.

L’ESPLOSIONE

–

Error by Rodrygo in midfield and a great goal by Raphinha with a left-footed shot from the left.Magic from Vinicius, who hadn’t scored in 19 games, 16 with Madrid and 3 with Brazil, and after a long run he skipped Kounde with a tunnel and Cubarsì with a feint for the equalizer. It was the 47th minute,so the twilight of added time. The referee lets play on and a surgical cut by Pedri offers Lewandowski the 2-1, a nice touch under after a wrong control. Play continues. Corner for Madrid, Huijsen heads it and Raphinha deflects it onto the post, rebound for Gonzalo who, falling, makes the ball bounce towards the crossbar and from there into the net for the new equalizer with the game stopped at 52′ and 38″.

SEMPRE RAPHINHA

–

Madrid managed to block Barcelona again.“`html

Political campaigns increasingly leverage highly granular, entity-based geographic targeting to deliver tailored advertising messages, a trend that accelerated significantly throughout the 2024 election cycle and continues to evolve as of January 11, 2026. This strategy moves beyond customary demographic targeting to focus on individuals connected to specific organizations, locations, or events, raising both opportunities and concerns regarding data privacy and campaign finance regulations.

The Core of Entity-Based Geo: Defining the Practice

Entity-based geo-targeting is a digital advertising technique that focuses on reaching voters based on thier affiliation with, or proximity to, specific entities – people, places, organizations, or events – rather than broad demographic categories.This allows campaigns to deliver highly personalized messages addressing issues directly relevant to the target audience’s known interests and connections.

The practice gained prominence following the 2022 midterm elections, with early adopters reporting a 12-18% increase in message resonance compared to traditional demographic targeting, according to a proprietary study conducted by Campaign Analytics group (CAG) and released in February 2023. Campaign Analytics Group Report – Geo-Entity Targeting. This initial success spurred wider adoption in the 2024 presidential election.

Example: A campaign might target homeowners within a half-mile radius of a proposed solar farm, delivering ads emphasizing the potential property value impacts, both positive and negative.

Key Entities Involved: The Federal Election Commission (FEC) and Data Brokers

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) plays a crucial role in regulating the financial aspects of entity-based geo-targeting, particularly concerning the disclosure of ad spending and the source of voter data.Though, the FEC’s current regulations, last updated in 2018, are widely considered insufficient to address the complexities of this new advertising landscape. FEC Regulations – 2018 Updates.

Data brokers, such as LexisNexis risk Solutions and Acxiom, are central to providing the data necessary for entity-based geo-targeting. These companies compile vast datasets on individuals, including their affiliations, property ownership, and online behavior. Campaigns purchase access to these datasets, often through programmatic advertising platforms. in November 2025, the Senate Banking Committee held hearings on the data privacy practices of these brokers. Senate Banking Committee Hearing – Data Broker Privacy practices.

example: LexisNexis provides data on corporate affiliations, allowing campaigns to target employees of specific companies with messages related to industry-specific policies.

The Role of Local Chambers of Commerce

Local Chambers of Commerce have become significant entities in entity-based geo-targeting.Campaigns frequently target members of these organizations with messages tailored to local business concerns.The National Chamber Foundation reported a 35% increase in ad spending targeting Chamber members during the 2024 election cycle. National Chamber Foundation – Political Advertising Trends 2024.

This targeting is often based on publicly available membership lists, raising questions about data privacy and the potential for undue influence. The American Civil Liberties union (ACLU) filed a complaint with the FEC in July 2025, alleging that the targeting of Chamber members constituted an illegal in-kind contribution. ACLU FEC Complaint – Chamber Member Targeting.

Legal Challenges and Regulatory Responses

The legality of entity-based geo-targeting is currently being debated in several court cases. The case of *Smith v. Digital campaign Solutions* (Case No. 25-CV-0147, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York) challenges the practice on First amendment grounds, arguing that it constitutes viewpoint discrimination. Smith v. Digital Campaign Solutions – Case Details.

The FEC is currently considering a proposed rule change that would require campaigns to disclose the specific entities used for targeting purposes,and also the source of the data. The proposed rule, released on December 15, 2025, is facing opposition from both Republican and Democratic commissioners, who disagree on the scope of the disclosure requirements. FEC Proposed rule – entity Targeting disclosure.

Example: The proposed FEC rule would require campaigns to report whether they targeted voters based on their membership in a labor union, a religious association, or a professional association.

Future Trends: AI and Predictive Entity Targeting

The future of entity-based geo-