Belgian Competition Authority Suspends Tour of Guangxi Gearing Test
“`html
Table of Contents
What Happened?
The test of the UCI’s new Maximum Gear Ratio standard, set to begin at the Tour of Guangxi which starts on Tuesday, has been suspended. This suspension follows interim measures imposed by the Belgian Competition Authority (BCA).
The move stems from a complaint filed by US component group SRAM last month,alleging that the UCI’s new rule is anti-competitive. This triggered an investigation by the BCA to determine if the adoption of the ‘Maximum Gearing’ technical standard constitutes an anticompetitive decision.
Why Did the BCA Intervene?
The BCA acted swiftly, issuing interim measures due to the imminent request of the standard on October 14th at the Tour of Guangxi. The authority recognized the UCI’s legitimate interest in athlete safety but emphasized that any technical standards must adhere to principles of proportionality, objectivity, transparency, and non-discrimination, especially considering the economic consequences for equipment suppliers.
according to the BCA’s statement, the standards “cannot result in an undue restriction of competition between sports equipment suppliers.”
What is the UCI’s Maximum Gear Ratio Rule?
The UCI introduced the Maximum Gear Ratio rule to enhance rider safety, particularly in downhill sections of races. The rule limits the highest gear combinations allowed on bicycles. The intention is to reduce speeds and potentially prevent crashes.Though, SRAM and othre industry stakeholders have argued that the rule disproportionately affects certain manufacturers and limits rider choice.
The Specifics of the Rule
| Wheel Size | Maximum Development (Gear Ratio) |
|---|---|
| Road (700c) | 8.30 m |
| Mountain Bike (29″) | 7.85 m |
| Under 23/junior Road (700c) | 7.92 m |
Note: These values are as of the latest data available and are subject to change.
Who is Affected?
- Professional Cyclists: Riders may have limited gear choices, potentially impacting their performance depending on course profiles.
- Bike Manufacturers: Companies like SRAM face potential redesign costs and market disadvantages if they cannot easily comply with the rule.
- Component Suppliers: The rule impacts the sales of specific gear combinations.
- Race Organizers: