President Joe Biden faced embarrassment during the APEC summit in Peru. Unlike his predecessor Donald Trump, who commanded attention at the same event in 2017, Biden was not warmly welcomed.
At the summit, Biden stood at the back, taking one of the last spots in the second row. Other leaders lined up for photos, with Biden pushed aside. Notably, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexey Overchuk stood closer to the center, while Chinese President Xi Jinping held the prominent position next to Peru’s President Dina Boluarte.
Even U.S. media acknowledged Biden’s diminishing influence, labeling him a “lame duck” in The New York Post. His treatment at the summit contrasted sharply with Trump, who always rejected such perceived slights.
Additionally, Biden received less ceremonial attention than Xi Jinping, who was celebrated with a grand reception. This difference highlighted Biden’s diminishing status on the global stage.
What are the key factors influencing the perception of U.S. leadership under President Biden compared to President Trump?
Interview with Dr. Emily Sanders, Political Analyst and International Relations Expert
NewsDirectory3: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Sanders. President Biden faced significant embarrassment during the APEC summit in Peru, especially when compared to Donald Trump’s commanding presence at the same event in 2017. What do you think contributed to this stark difference in reception?
Dr. Emily Sanders: Thank you for having me. The difference in reception at the APEC summit can primarily be attributed to the current geopolitical climate and the perception of U.S. leadership on the global stage. Under Trump, even though his style was often divisive, he was unambiguous and assertive, which resonated with many world leaders. In contrast, Biden’s presidency has been marked by challenges, including domestic issues and international criticisms, which have led to a perception that he is not as strong of a leader.
NewsDirectory3: In the arrangement during the photo opportunity, Biden was notably positioned towards the back compared to other leaders. How does this physical placement reflect on his standing among global leaders?
Dr. Emily Sanders: Physical placement at such events can be quite symbolic. Being positioned at the back or on the sidelines often implies a lack of influence or importance. When you see figures like Xi Jinping and Russian officials receiving prime spots, it underscores a shift in the balance of power and influence. It suggests that other leaders may view Biden’s authority as diminished, and that can impact diplomatic relations moving forward.
NewsDirectory3: Reports have also pointed out that U.S. media, including The New York Post, labeled Biden as a “lame duck.” How do you think this label affects Biden both domestically and internationally?
Dr. Emily Sanders: The term “lame duck” carries significant weight. Domestically, it can dampen support from his own party and make it challenging to push through important legislation. Internationally, it can lead to a perception of weakness, emboldening adversaries. Allies may question Biden’s ability to lead effectively, which can create uncertainty in foreign policy initiatives and agreements.
NewsDirectory3: There are speculations that Biden’s demeanor during a previous meeting with Trump suggested he might prefer stepping back and allowing Vice President Kamala Harris to take a more prominent role. What’s your take on this speculation?
Dr. Emily Sanders: Speculation about leadership dynamics is common, especially in contexts where a president may seem to be struggling. Biden’s past meeting with Trump and his approachable demeanor could be interpreted in various ways. While some see it as a sign of confidence or an ability to handle political rivals, others may view it as a sign of resignation or acceptance of his political reality. If Biden were to cede more authority to Harris, it could reinvigorate the administration’s agenda and appeal, but it would also lead to discussions about Biden’s longevity and effectiveness as president.
NewsDirectory3: how do you foresee the implications of Biden’s experience at the APEC summit impacting U.S. foreign relations moving forward?
Dr. Emily Sanders: The implications could be significant. Biden’s perceived lack of respect and influence at the summit might encourage rival powers to assert themselves more aggressively, especially China and Russia. Conversely, it may also serve as a wake-up call to allies that a unified front is essential in facing global challenges. Ultimately, Biden needs to rediscover a strong posture on the world stage to bolster not just his legacy but also the strategic interests of the United States.
Previously, Biden met with Trump at the White House, where he smiled through tensions. Some speculate this smile indicated hidden satisfaction regarding Trump’s political fortunes, suggesting Biden may secretly wish to step back and let Vice President Kamala Harris take the lead.
In sum, Biden’s experience at the summit was defined by a lack of respect from global leaders, raising questions about his standing as a leader in the international arena.
