Biffy Clyro: Losing It – The Story Behind the Music

Here’s a breakdown of Simon neil’s (of Biffy Clyro) evolving ‍stance on speaking out about the ⁤situation in Gaza and Palestine, as presented in the text:

Initial Hesitation & Support for Others:

* He initially defends other bands who are speaking out, believing they have a right to their opinions, as long as they don’t call for violence.
* He acknowledges‍ the courage it takes ⁤to take a public stand.
* ⁤ He recognizes the dilemma for artists – balancing honest expression with potential career repercussions.
* He admits the⁢ interview is “skirting with the fact that we’re⁣ basically talking about Gaza and Palestine” and finds it “ridiculous that talking about a genocide over there is risky.”

Clarification & Strong Condemnation:

* After the interview, he calls back to clarify his position, stating he feels ⁢he should speak out to show respect for other bands doing ‍so.
* He expresses ⁤a desire to “put ⁢a flag⁤ in⁣ the ground” without letting the issue overshadow his band’s ⁣music.
* ⁢He then delivers a very strong condemnation of the situation: “what’s happening in⁣ Gaza and Palestine is ⁢one of the most⁣ revolting things ever, it’s heinous, it needs to f***ing stop.”
* ‍ He calls for an end to⁤ genocide and⁤ famine⁢ globally.
* He acknowledges‍ the risks (“it’s⁣ a minefield”) ⁤but believes it’s a risk worth taking to stand on ‍the “right side of things.”

In essence, simon Neil moves from a position⁤ of supporting others’ activism while acknowledging ⁢the risks of speaking out himself, to a firm and direct condemnation⁣ of the events in gaza and‍ Palestine, despite‍ those risks. He feels compelled to take a stand due to the severity of the situation.