Billy Ray Cyrus Sues Woman Claiming to Be Miley’s Mother
Billy Ray Cyrus Pursues Legal Action Against Claim of Biological Motherhood
Table of Contents
Dispute Over Miley Cyrus’ Parentage
Country music star Billy Ray Cyrus is seeking damages from a woman who publicly asserted she is Miley Cyrus’s biological mother. Cyrus filed a lawsuit characterizing the claims as “false and absurd,” according to court documents.
The legal action stems from statements made by the individual, whose identity has not been widely publicized, alleging a different biological parentage for the singer. Cyrus maintains that he is Miley Cyrus’s biological father, a fact consistently supported by public records and family statements.
Legal Basis for the Lawsuit
The lawsuit alleges defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Cyrus argues the false claims have caused significant personal and professional harm. He is seeking monetary damages to compensate for the reputational damage and emotional anguish caused by the allegations.
Legal experts suggest that proving defamation requires demonstrating the statements were false, published to a third party, and caused actual harm. The case will likely hinge on establishing these elements and the extent of the damage suffered by Cyrus.
Miley Cyrus’s Background
Miley Cyrus was born Destiny Hope Cyrus on November 23, 1992, in Franklin, Tennessee, to Billy Ray Cyrus and Leticia “Tish” Cyrus. She rose to fame as the star of the Disney Channel television series Hannah Montana.
Throughout her career, Miley Cyrus has consistently acknowledged Billy Ray Cyrus as her father, and their relationship has been publicly documented through numerous interviews and appearances.
Ongoing Legal Proceedings
As of December 14,2025,the case is in its initial stages. The defendant has yet to file a formal response to the lawsuit. Further developments will be reported as they become available.
This legal dispute highlights the challenges public figures face in protecting their reputations against false and damaging claims. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for similar situations involving celebrity parentage and defamation.