James Hetfield Reflects on Metallica’s ‘Load’ adn ‘Reload’ Era: Compromises, Cliff Burton, and Near Breakup
Table of Contents
Metallica’s current “M72” world tour is delivering a potent mix of classic anthems and deeper cuts, with tracks like “Until It Sleeps” and “King Nothing” receiving notable airtime. But looking back,frontman James Hetfield has been remarkably candid about periods in teh band’s history that weren’t quite as harmonious – particularly the era surrounding the Load and Reload albums.These albums,while commercially successful,represent a time of internal struggle and compromise for the band,and Hetfield has recently revisited those feelings in past interviews.
The ‘Load’ and ‘Reload’ Compromise: Hetfield’s Outlook
In a 2017 interview with Clash, Hetfield openly discussed the compromises Metallica made in pursuit of mainstream acceptance. He pinpointed the Load and Reload era as a period where he wasn’t fully aligned with the band’s direction.
“As far as doing something that doesn’t feel right, I’m sure there’s been a few times that its happened – the ’Load’ and ‘Reload’ era, for me, was one of those; the way that was looking, I wasn’t 100 percent on with it,” Hetfield admitted. However, he emphasized a commitment to band unity. ”I would say that that was a compromise. I said, ‘I’m going with Lars’s and Kirk’s vision on this. You guys are extremely passionate about this,so I’ll jump on board,because if the four of us are into it,it’s going to be better.’ So I did my best with it, and it didn’t pan out as good as I was hoping, but, again, there’s no regrets, because at the time it felt like the right thing to do.”
This reveals a engaging dynamic within Metallica – a willingness to experiment and support each other’s creative passions, even when those passions diverged from Hetfield’s own instincts. It highlights the band’s collaborative spirit,but also the internal tension that arose from pursuing a different sonic and visual identity.
The Fallout: Near Breakup and Personal Struggles
The experimentation of Load and Reload wasn’t without consequences. The period following these albums and the subsequent tour was tumultuous for Metallica. The band entered a significant tailspin, ultimately leading to bassist Jason Newsted’s departure. Hetfield himself battled personal demons, spending a considerable amount of time in rehab. The band came dangerously close to disbanding altogether.
This period is a stark reminder that creative exploration can come at a cost.While the band was striving for artistic growth, the internal pressures and external criticisms took a heavy toll on its members. it’s a testament to their resilience that thay managed to navigate these challenges and emerge, albeit scarred, on the other side.
What Would Cliff Burton Think? Hetfield’s Reflection
The changes Metallica underwent in the 1990s and early 2000s weren’t just challenging for the band members present; Hetfield has also pondered how the band’s original bassist, the late Cliff Burton, would have reacted.
In a 2016 interview with teamrock, Hetfield was asked this very question. He believed Burton would have offered strong resistance to the band’s stylistic shifts, particularly the more polished and alternative-rock influenced sound of albums like Load, Reload, and St. Anger.
“Well, I certainly would have thought there would have been some resistance, without a doubt,” Hetfield stated. He acknowledged the boldness of the Black Album,stating,”I think the ‘Black Album’ was a great album and I appreciate the fact that we did have the balls to do that…” However,he continued,”I would certainly think that the ‘Load’ and ‘Reload’ [era] I would have had an ally that was very against it all – the reinvention or the U2 version of Metallica.”
This is a poignant reflection on burton’s artistic integrity and his likely disapproval of a direction that stray
