Botafogo SAF Faces Criticism Over Management and Controversial Sale Listing
- The ownership of Botafogo de Futebol e Regatas has entered a period of extreme instability following the decision by creditors of Eagle Football Holdings to put the club's...
- The sale package advertised by Cork Gully is not limited to the Brazilian side.
- The public sale of the SAF follows a breakdown in the cooperative model established by John Textor's Eagle Football project.
The ownership of Botafogo de Futebol e Regatas has entered a period of extreme instability following the decision by creditors of Eagle Football Holdings to put the club’s Sociedade Anônima do Futebol (SAF) up for sale. On April 11, 2026, the British consultancy Cork Gully, which was appointed as judicial administrator by Eagle Football’s creditors at the end of March, published a classified advertisement in the Financial Times offering the majority stakes of the club for liquidation.
The sale package advertised by Cork Gully is not limited to the Brazilian side. The consultancy listed Botafogo, described as one of Brazil’s most historic clubs
, alongside the French club Olympique Lyonnais and the Belgian professional club RWD Brussels. Potential investors and buyers were instructed to submit expressions of interest via a corporate email address specifically created for these assets.
Legal Disputes and Corporate Collapse
The public sale of the SAF follows a breakdown in the cooperative model established by John Textor’s Eagle Football project. On April 4, 2026, Botafogo SAF formally filed a lawsuit against Olympique Lyonnais in the French courts. This legal action marks a significant shift from the internal collaboration previously touted by the project’s leadership.
Simultaneously, the club has faced legal challenges within Brazil. The 21st Chamber of Private Law of the Court of Justice of Rio de Janeiro (TJ-RJ) recently denied a request from Botafogo’s social club to financially block the SAF and demand a reimbursement of R$ 155.4 million from Eagle Football. The judge ruled that the appeal was filed incorrectly at the second instance level without prior analysis at the first instance, rendering the request not ready for judgment.
Despite denying the monetary claim, the court imposed a restrictive measure on the SAF’s management. The judge ruled that any future sale of assets or the distribution of dividends must be previously reported to the court, under penalty of nullity. This measure ensures judicial oversight of the SAF’s financial transactions moving forward.
Internal Conflict and Management Struggles
The corporate instability is mirrored by a deepening rift between the club’s leadership and its owner. The Botafogo Council has been pressing for the departure of John Textor, while evaluating new proposals from other investors. This internal friction has led to mutual accusations regarding the financial health of the operation.
John Textor has directed criticism toward board members, alleging that their refusal to sign essential documents has obstructed the entry of new financing and prevented the capitalization of the SAF. Textor claims these actions have created a cycle of unfounded criticism regarding the club’s financial viability.
Sporting Success Amidst Financial Turmoil
These management crises arrive during a period of significant sporting achievement for the Rio de Janeiro-based club. Botafogo recently secured the Brazilian league title in 2024, marking its third championship alongside wins in 1968 and 1995. The club also won the Copa Libertadores in 2024 and the Copa CONMEBOL in 1993.

Currently playing in the Campeonato Brasileiro Série A and the Campeonato Carioca, the club remains one of Brazil’s Big 12 Clubs. It holds several notable records in Brazilian football, including the greatest victory ever recorded in the country’s history—a 24–0 win against Sport Club Mangueira in 1909—and the record for the most players called up to the Brazil national team for World Cups.
The contrast between the club’s recent trophy haul and the current liquidation efforts by Eagle Football’s creditors highlights a volatile transition period for the institution as it navigates the legal and financial complexities of the SAF model.
