Home » World » California Billionaire Tax: Proposals, Backlash, and Exodus

California Billionaire Tax: Proposals, Backlash, and Exodus

by Ahmed Hassan - World News Editor

The battle⁢ over⁤ a new ⁤tax on California’s billionaires is ​set to heat up in the coming months⁣ as citizens spar over whether the state should squeeze it’s ‍ultra-rich to better serve its ordinary residents.

The proposed billionaire tax that triggered the tempest ⁣is still⁣ far from being approved by voters​ or​ even ⁣making the ballot,​ but the idea has already ​sparked backlash from ⁤vocal tech moguls – some of whom have⁢ already shifted‍ their bases outside⁤ the state.

under the Billionaire Tax Act,‌ Californians worth more than $1 billion woudl pay a one-time 5% tax on their total ‍wealth. The ⁤Service Employees International union-United Healthcare Workers West, the union behind the act, said the measure would⁤ raise much-needed ⁣money‌ for healthcare, ⁣education and​ food​ assistance programs. ⁣

Other unions have piled on billionaires, targeting⁢ the rich in Los Angeles.

A ‌group of⁣ Los Angeles labor unions said Wednesday that it is proposing a‌ ballot measure to raise taxes on companies whose⁢ chief executive officers earn ⁢50 times more than their⁣ median-paid employees.

Here is how ⁤this fight could continue to play ⁤out in the Golden ⁣State:

Who would be affected?

The California⁣ billionaire tax would apply to about 200 California billionaires who ⁣reside in the state as of ‍Jan. ⁢1.Roughly 90% of funds would go to healthcare and the rest to ⁣public⁣ K-14 education and⁢ state food assistance.

The tax, due in ‌2027, would exclude real estate,​ pensions and retirement accounts, according to an analysis from the Legislative Analyst’s Office, a nonpartisan⁣ government agency. Billionaires⁤ could spread out the tax payment over five years, but would have to pay more.

Which billionaires are already⁤ distancing themselves from California?

Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin

Google is still headquartered in California, but ⁢December filings to‍ the California Secretary of State show other companies‌ tied to Page and Brin recently converted out of ⁢the state.

One filing, for example, ​shows that one of the companies thay managed, now named T-rex holdings, moved from Palo Alto to Reno last month.

Business Insider and ⁤the New York Times ​earlier reported on these filings. Google didn’t respond to a⁣ request for comment.

Palantir co-founder Peter‌ Thiel

Thiel Capital, based in los​ Angeles, announced ​in December it opened an ⁤office in Miami. The ‍firm didn’t respond to a request for comment. Thiel recently contributed ⁤$3 million to ‍the political action committee of the ‍California Business roundtable, which is opposing the​ ballot measure, records provided‍ to the ​Secretary of State’s ​Office show.⁤

Oracle co-founder and Chief Technology Officer Larry ‍Ellison

Years before the wealth ‍tax proposal, Ellison began pulling back ⁣from California, but he’s continued‌ to distance ‌himself ‍farther from the state since the proposal emerged.

Last year, Ellison⁤ sold his ‍San francisco mansion for $45 million. ⁢the home on 2850 Broadway was sold off-market in‍ mid-December, according to Redfin.

Oracle declined to comment.⁢

DoorDash co-founder and Chief Technology Officer Andy Fang

Adversarial Research & Freshness Check – California Wealth​ Tax Proposal (as of 2026/01/19⁤ 18:19:21)

Here’s a ‌breakdown of the factual claims in the provided text, verified against authoritative sources, and a ⁢freshness check⁤ for recent developments.

1. Failed Wealth Tax Attempts:

* Claim: ⁢A 2020 proposal‌ for⁢ an⁢ annual⁣ tax on California residents with net worth⁣ over $30 million failed.
* Verification: This is TRUE. Assembly Bill 2088 (AB 2088), proposing a net ‌wealth tax, was withdrawn‍ in January 2020 due to insufficient support. (Source: https://lao.ca.gov/publications/Report/4324 ⁢- California Legislative Analyst’s Office)

2. Support from ‌Sanders‌ &⁢ Khanna:

* Claim: Sen. Bernie Sanders ⁣(I-Vt.) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Fremont) have backed the wealth tax proposal.
* Verification: This is ​ TRUE. Both Sanders​ and khanna have⁤ publicly⁣ supported wealth‌ tax‌ proposals at the federal ⁣level. Khanna has specifically advocated for ‍wealth taxes and​ has been involved in⁤ discussions regarding California’s proposals.⁢ (Source:‌ https://rokhanna.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-khanna-sanders-introduce-tax-millionaires-act – Rep. Khanna’s‌ official website; numerous news reports on Sanders’ wealth tax ‌proposals)

3. Proposition 30 (2012):

* ‌ Claim: Californians approved Proposition 30 in 2012, increasing sales and income ⁣tax⁤ for high earners.
* Verification: this‍ is TRUE.Proposition 30⁤ temporarily raised sales tax and‍ income⁤ tax rates for individuals ⁢earning over $250,000. (Source: https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_30_(2012)) – Ballotpedia)

4. Potential Revenue & Uncertainty (LAO Report):

* Claim: ⁣ The Legislative Analyst’s Office ⁣(LAO) estimates the‌ tax could generate tens of billions but acknowledges⁣ uncertainty due to potential behavioral changes​ and fluctuating ​stock prices.
* ⁤ Verification: This⁤ is TRUE.The LAO’s December ⁣2023 analysis of the ‌proposed wealth tax⁢ (Initiative 25-024) confirms this. The report⁤ highlights significant uncertainty in‌ revenue projections, citing potential avoidance strategies and ⁢the volatility of asset values. (Source: https://lao.ca.gov/BallotAnalysis/Initiative/2025-024 – California Legislative Analyst’s ⁤Office)

5. Revenue Estimates & Arguments:

* Claim: Supporters estimate ‍$100 billion in revenue; opponents fear billionaires will leave.
* Verification: This is⁢ TRUE. proponents of the⁢ initiative, like the SEIU-UHW, have cited $100 billion as⁣ a potential revenue figure. Opponents, like⁤ Chamath Palihapitiya, have ‍warned of significant revenue ⁤loss due to potential emigration. (Source: Multiple news reports covering the initiative, including https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-12-14/california-wealth-tax-initiative-billionaires ‍- Los Angeles Times)

6. “Billionaire Exodus”⁣ Debate:

* Claim: The‍ union backing the initiative ⁣claims the⁢ “billionaire exodus” is overstated,with few departures by‍ Jan 1st. Palihapitiya argues losses‍ from those who left will‍ outweigh gains.
* Verification: This is TRUE,⁤ but evolving. Initial reports in early⁤ January 2024 indicated a limited number of high-net-worth individuals had demonstrably left ⁣California before the January ⁤1st‌ deadline. ⁤However,tracking actual‌ wealth migration is complex and ongoing. Palihapitiya’s claim remains a prediction, and its accuracy is yet to be persistent. (Source: ⁢ https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-03/california-s-wealth-tax-doesn-t-spark-billionaire-flight-yet – Bloomberg; various news ​reports ⁤on Palihapitiya’s statements)

**breaking News⁢ Check (as of 2026/01/19 18:19

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.