California Solar Energy boom Faces Corruption Risks, Study ‌Finds

Updated June 12, 2025

California’s rapid expansion of solar power, driven by climate goals, faces‍ a hidden challenge: corruption. A ⁢new study in Energy Strategy Reviews examines public and private sector corruption patterns⁣ within the state’s solar​ market.

researchers at Boston‌ University’s institute for Global Sustainability ​(IGS) ‍pinpointed seven distinct corruption types affecting california’s solar energy sector. these include favoritism in project approvals,such⁤ as a case‍ involving a U.S. Department of​ the Interior official and a solar ⁣company lobbyist.The authors urge significant solar‍ reforms to ensure a fair energy transition as the U.S. relies more on‍ solar to reduce carbon emissions.

Benjamin Sovacool, IGS ⁣director and Boston University professor,⁣ said the ‍solar industry’s current path⁤ of “bad governance and bad behavior” cannot continue. The study highlights abuses of power, displacement of Indigenous groups, tax evasion, and falsified project ⁣data.

The study analyzed the California solar market’s explosive growth ⁢from 2010 to 2024, during which solar ‍energy production reached 79,544 gigawatt hours, enough to ‍power about 7.4 million U.S. ⁤homes annually, according to the State of Renewable Energy dashboard.The research reveals corruption’s adverse effects on⁢ communities, policymaking, and ​project planning.

Alexander Dunlap, IGS research⁢ fellow, noted the prevalence of corruption at all levels of solar growth, even in a well-regulated state like California.

Favoritism and Corruption in solar Projects

Researchers investigated utility-scale solar deployments in Riverside​ County to understand⁢ how corruption undermines the solar market. they gathered insights from residents, construction workers, NGOs, solar company employees, and government agencies through focus groups, site observations, and ⁣interviews in communities like Blythe and Desert Center.

While confirming individual corruption claims is difficult, the study‍ combines personal accounts with news reports, court testimony, ⁢and official records.

The study identified several ‌corruption patterns:

  1. Clientelism ‌and Favoritism: Hiring friends or​ family and unfairly awarding contracts.
  2. Rent-seeking⁢ and​ Land Grabbing: Redirecting public funds and seizing land from Indigenous groups.
  3. Service Diversion: Withholding local benefits‌ or prioritizing ‍wealthier areas for power distribution.
  4. Theft: Damaging‍ flora, cultural artifacts, or animal habitats during ⁤construction.
  5. Greenwashing: Misleading the public about​ environmental benefits and ⁢using flawed impact assessments.
  6. Tax Evasion‌ and Avoidance: underpaying taxes or failing to​ allocate funds to affected communities.
  7. Non-openness: Hiding crucial information about project impacts and benefits.

What’s next

The ​study’s ​authors recommend corruption risk mapping, subsidy registers, transparency initiatives, strong enforcement of anti-corruption laws, and shared ownership models to improve accountability and ensure ⁤a ⁤just energy transition in ​California’s solar market.