California Water Wars: LA’s Century-Long Battle
California’s Water Crisis: A Century of Conflict
Table of Contents
- California’s Water Crisis: A Century of Conflict
- California’s Water Crisis: A Century of Conflict - Q&A Guide
- introduction
- The St. Francis dam Disaster
- The California Water Wars and Owens valley
- Q: What are the California Water Wars?
- Q: Who was William Mulholland and what role did he play in the California Water Wars?
- Q: How did the los Angeles Aqueduct affect Owens Valley?
- Q: What actions did the residents of Owens Valley take in response to the water diversions?
- Q: Who were Wilfred and Mark Watterson and what was their involvement in the Owens Valley conflict?
- Current Water Issues in California
- Q: How does water usage in California break down between residential and agricultural sectors?
- Q: What is the Monterey Plus Amendments and how has it affected water management in California?
- Q: What is the enduring Groundwater Management Act (SGMA)?
- Q: What ongoing issues contribute to California’s water crisis?
- Summary Table: Key Events and Policies in California’s Water History
- Conclusion
Just before midnight on March 7, 1928, the St Francis Dam, located roughly 80km (50 miles) inland of Los Angeles, collapsed. There were no survivors to witness the disaster, but investigators later resolute that the 56-metre-tall (184ft-) barrier failed catastrophically, unleashing 12.4 billion gallons of water down the San Francisquito Canyon in a 43 metres (141ft) high wave.
Five hours later, the waters reached the Pacific Ocean, leaving behind concrete chunks weighing up to 10,000 tonnes. The surge, nearly 3km (2 miles) wide, devastated towns, cut power, and killed at least 431 people. Remains were found as late as 1994, even near the mexican border.
The dam had shown cracks and leaks since its reservoir began filling in 1926. Builders dismissed these issues, proceeding with filling the reservoir. The water, controversially extracted from Owens Valley, was crucial for Los Angeles’s growing population.
Over two years, new cracks and seepage appeared around the dam’s abutments. By February 1928,significant leaks worried local farmers. Chief engineer William Mulholland declared it normal.
On the morning of the collapse, Mulholland and his team inspected the dam, deeming it safe but needing repairs. hours later,it failed. An investigation cited “defective foundations” as the cause.
It was the largest American civil engineering disaster of the century, a result of western expansion and the California Water wars, pitting the public against private business interests and setting the stage for a century of conflict over the state’s most contested resource.

‘We are going to turn that country dry’
Water remains a critical issue for California nearly a century later. During the fires that ravaged Los Angeles in January 2025, firefighters faced low hydrant water pressure. investigators attributed this to high demand, while then-president-elect Donald Trump blamed state Governor Gavin Newsom, citing “overregulation” designed to protect endangered species.
In recent interviews with firefighters, it was revealed that the difficulty in obtaining enough water to fight the fires was likely unavoidable.
Bobbie Scopa, a firefighter with nearly 45 years of experience, stated, “There’s no urban municipal water system that could support that. You’re going to run out of water, no matter what. It’s not that uncommon. It happens when there’s large fires.”
While water shortage is a valid concern amid California’s droughts, the Los Angeles water system’s most pressing issues may involve where water ends up. Residents suffer as big agriculture and water investors extract or privatize limited supplies. Studies by the University of Southern California indicate that only 10 percent of state water goes to residents, while 80 percent irrigates crops.
This situation continues a pattern dating back to the water system’s creation, marked by resource theft, political corruption, and the St Francis Dam disaster.the result is an uncertain future where powerful business interests increasingly parch vulnerable residents.
William L Kahrl wrote in Water and Power: The Conflict Over Los Angeles Water Supply in the Owens Valley, “The history of California in the twentieth century is the story of a state inventing itself with water.” Kahrl’s book details the events that brought water to Los Angeles from Owens Valley via a 375km (233-mile) aqueduct, benefiting the former at the expense of the latter, and sparking violent conflict.
Before Southern California’s American settlement, the native Paiute peoples irrigated Owens Valley during droughts. it was suggested the Owens region could become a Paiute reservation. However, after the Los Angeles aqueduct diverted water to the expanding city, the tribe suffered greatly when the valley’s water depleted and its economy declined.
William Mulholland warned an associate early in the aqueduct effort, “Do not go to Inyo County,” referring to the county containing Owens Valley. “We are going to turn that country dry.”
The California Water Wars
Owens Lake was wholly dried out between 1913 and 1934, but not without significant resistance from residents.
Andrew Ayers,professor at the University of Nevada,Reno,and research fellow at the public Policy Institute of California’s Water Policy Centre,explains,”It was highly acrimonious at the time because it was one of the first [modern] major water transfers.” He adds that with little legal precedent, “people had to muddle their way through it”.
The ranchers of Owens Valley, whose population grew to about 7,000 before declining, resisted by dynamiting the aqueduct.
According to Kahrl, Mulholland “consistently failed to appreciate the depth of the anger his policies were creating…. Night riders now plied the back roads of inyo, preying upon the aqueduct” with explosives and threatening anyone suspected of being associated with the LADWP.
The attacks peaked on November 1, 1924, when farmers blew up the aqueduct’s emergency spillway in the Alabama Hills, returning water to the valley. These events were fictionalized in the 1939 movie New Frontiers, where John Wayne battles villainous water barons.
The Los Angeles Times declared that the conflict represented “the forces of law and order against Socialism – peace and prosperity against misery and chaos – the Stars and Stripes against the red flag”.
While some ranchers acted alone, others were organized and funded by Owens valley businessmen Wilfred and Mark Watterson, who owned the Inyo county Bank. In August 1927, the bank collapsed, devastating locals’ savings.
The Wattersons admitted to using the money to fund the fight against Los Angeles and were charged with 36 counts of embezzlement and grand theft totaling $450,000.27 (over $8.2m today). The Los Angeles Times labeled them “mobsters” and falsely linked them to the Ku Klux Klan, but they were greeted by cheering farmers at their trial.
Kahrl wrote, “As the district attorney presented his closing argument, he broke into tears, and the judge and jury wept with him.” The Wattersons,sentenced to 10 years in prison,received the only criminal penalties for the water uprising.
The court ruling ended the conflict. With the lake dry, the lush land turned brown, and the Owens Valley economy collapsed, particularly affecting the Paiute peoples.
Owens Valley became the nation’s biggest source of dust pollution. During World War II, the US built a Japanese internment camp there. One internee recalled, “We slept in the dust; we breathed the dust; and we ate the dust.”
Mulholland and eaton had a falling out when Eaton refused to sell property for a reservoir. Mulholland spent years and $1.3m (from a municipal bond) building the St Francis Dam. Construction workers reported that “the accent was heavy on the urge to overcome obstacles and accomplish results” with little attention given to safety.
After the dam’s collapse, a jury found Mulholland not criminally culpable, but he accepted duty and expressed guilt. “I envy the dead,” he told the county coroner.
He resigned, retired in disgrace, and died in Los Angeles in 1935.

The water wars continue
The state’s struggle over water was still far from over, however.
“Water is a critical resource in the American West,” says Ayers. “It’s very easy to fall into a situation where controversy and conflict become not only the dominating narratives but the dominating modes of operating, and finding ways to avoid that and stoke cooperation and collaboration pay big dividends.”
In the century that followed the California Water Wars, conflict over the region’s water has continued. Today, the Los Angeles Aqueduct provides about a third of the city’s imported water, with the rest coming from the Colorado River and other sources throughout California.
“There are conflicting interests within the delta,” says Ayers, referring to the Sacramento-San Joaquin River delta that serves much of the region’s water. “when we move large amounts of water from the wetter north down to the drier south, how that system is managed has implications for a lot of different players.”
In recent decades, those interests have placed homeowners throughout the region at odds with large-scale producers of water-thirsty crops like almonds, oranges and pomegranates.Those living alongside and sharing wells with such farms frequently report low pressure or even a complete lack of water as dwindling supplies are diverted to irrigate the agricultural industry. Not only do many homeowners end up living entirely without a running source, but they find it unachievable to sell their now-waterless homes.
These latest water conflicts have largely been driven by a 1994 deregulation agreement known as the Monterey Plus Amendments. this pact – forged behind closed doors between the California Department of Water Resources and several water contractors – transferred ownership of public water supplies in Kern Country east of Los Angeles to the Kern Water Bank Authority, an entity controlled by agribusiness interests. Since then, a growing industry of private water banks has developed, allowing their owners to control pricing and access, forcing residents in vulnerable areas to pay more while others have seen their water supplies drained entirely.
After 20 years of outcry over the situation, California passed the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act in 2014 with the intention of achieving a sustainable water system by 2042. The act affords local water agencies greater control over their groundwater basins while requiring that they create and implement plans for preventing excessive use and other undesirable impacts like ground subsidence. Public water advocates, however, argue that such measures are too little too late, citing the already incipient crisis, and the ongoing practice of private water ownership.
In the meantime, as homeowners run dry and hydrant pressure runs low, the state’s agricultural sector continues to increase its profits year after year. All the while, the temperature is rising.
California’s Water Crisis: A Century of Conflict - Q&A Guide
introduction
California has faced ongoing water challenges marked by historical conflicts, infrastructure failures, and complex water management issues.This Q&A guide explores the key events, influential figures, and current issues surrounding California’s water crisis, offering insights into its past, present, and future.
The St. Francis dam Disaster
Q: What was the St. Francis Dam disaster and when did it occur?
A: The St. Francis Dam disaster occurred on March 7, 1928, when the dam collapsed catastrophically. This event unleashed 12.4 billion gallons of water down the San Francisquito Canyon in a 43-meter-high wave, devastating towns and causing significant loss of life. It remains one of the largest civil engineering disasters in American history.
Q: What caused the St. Francis Dam to collapse?
A: The investigation following the disaster cited “defective foundations” as the primary cause of the collapse. The dam had shown cracks and leaks since its reservoir began filling in 1926, but these issues were dismissed by the builders, leading to the catastrophic failure.
Q: How many people died in the St. Francis Dam disaster?
A: At least 431 people died in the St. Francis Dam disaster. Remains were even found near the Mexican border, highlighting the extensive reach and impact of the floodwaters.
The California Water Wars and Owens valley
Q: What are the California Water Wars?
A: The California Water Wars refer to the early 20th-century conflicts over water resources between Los Angeles and the Owens Valley. Los Angeles, driven by its growing population, diverted water from Owens Valley through a 375km (233-mile) aqueduct, benefiting the city but devastating the valley’s ecosystem and economy.
Q: Who was William Mulholland and what role did he play in the California Water Wars?
A: William Mulholland was the chief engineer for the Los angeles Bureau of Water Works and Supply (later the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, or LADWP). He was instrumental in designing and constructing the Los Angeles Aqueduct,which diverted water from Owens valley to Los angeles,leading to significant conflict with the residents of Owens Valley.
Q: How did the los Angeles Aqueduct affect Owens Valley?
A: The Los Angeles Aqueduct led to the depletion of water resources in Owens Valley, causing Owens Lake to dry up wholly between 1913 and 1934. This resulted in economic collapse, ecological devastation, and increased dust pollution, severely impacting the local Paiute population and agricultural communities.
Q: What actions did the residents of Owens Valley take in response to the water diversions?
A: Residents of Owens valley resisted the water diversions by resorting to acts of sabotage, including dynamiting the Los Angeles Aqueduct. These actions were aimed at restoring water to the valley and disrupting the flow of water to Los Angeles.
Q: Who were Wilfred and Mark Watterson and what was their involvement in the Owens Valley conflict?
A: wilfred and Mark Watterson were businessmen who owned the Inyo County Bank. They financially supported the resistance against Los Angeles’s water policies. They faced criminal charges for embezzlement and grand theft after using bank funds to support the anti-Los Angeles efforts.
Current Water Issues in California
Q: How does water usage in California break down between residential and agricultural sectors?
A: Studies indicate that only about 10 percent of California’s water is used by residents, while approximately 80 percent is used for irrigating crops. This disparity has led to conflicts between homeowners and large-scale agricultural producers.
Q: What is the Monterey Plus Amendments and how has it affected water management in California?
A: The 1994 Monterey Plus Amendments deregulated water management, transferring ownership of public water supplies in Kern County to the Kern Water Bank Authority, controlled by agribusiness interests. This led to the growth of private water banks, allowing them to control pricing and access, often disadvantaging vulnerable residents.
Q: What is the enduring Groundwater Management Act (SGMA)?
A: The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), passed in 2014, aims to achieve sustainable water systems by 2042. It grants local water agencies greater control over their groundwater basins, requiring them to create and implement plans for preventing excessive use and undesirable impacts like ground subsidence.
Q: What ongoing issues contribute to California’s water crisis?
A: Ongoing issues include conflicting interests between residential and agricultural sectors,the privatization of water resources,increasing profits in the agricultural sector,rising temperatures,and the continuous struggle to balance water demands with environmental needs.
Summary Table: Key Events and Policies in California’s Water History
| Event/Policy | Year | Description | Impact |
| ————————————- | —- | —————————————————————————————————————————————- | ————————————————————————————————————————————————– |
| Los Angeles Aqueduct construction | 1913 | Diversion of water from Owens Valley to Los Angeles. | Depletion of Owens Valley’s water resources, economic collapse, and ecological damage. |
| St. Francis Dam Disaster | 1928 | Catastrophic failure of the dam,releasing billions of gallons of water.| Loss of life (at least 431 deaths), widespread destruction, and a turning point in public perception of water management. |
| Monterey Plus Amendments | 1994 | Deregulation agreement transferring public water supplies to agribusiness interests. | Growth of private water banks, leading to price control and limited access for residents. |
| Sustainable Groundwater Management Act | 2014 | Legislation aimed at achieving sustainable water systems by 2042 through local control and management of groundwater basins. | Aims to prevent excessive water usage and land subsidence, but criticized by some as being too little, too late. |
Conclusion
California’s water crisis is a complex issue rooted in historical events,policy decisions,and ongoing environmental challenges. Understanding the history of water management and the impacts of past actions is crucial for developing sustainable solutions and ensuring a reliable water supply for all Californians.
