Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Car Safety: Body vs Electronics - News Directory 3

Car Safety: Body vs Electronics

March 29, 2025 Catherine Williams Business
News Context
At a glance
  • New car safety⁤ standards are increasingly focused‍ on active‍ safety features.
  • New car safety is rigorously ⁤evaluated in nearly every global market.
  • As vehicles have advanced, so has the evaluation⁢ process.
Original source: 1188.lv

Active vs. Passive Safety: How Car Safety Standards Are ‌Evolving

New car safety⁤ standards are increasingly focused‍ on active‍ safety features. Here’s‍ why.

Electronics⁤ Superior to Metal?

New car safety is rigorously ⁤evaluated in nearly every global market. In Europe,the euro NCAP,an‍ autonomous ⁤non-profit institution,has been​ conducting these ratings as 1996.

As vehicles have advanced, so has the evaluation⁢ process. Initially,assessments centered ⁤on basic collision tests.The Renault Laguna was the first vehicle to achieve a maximum five-star⁤ rating,prompting other manufacturers ⁤to develop durable,impact-absorbing⁢ bodies.

The Euro NCAP criteria have become⁣ progressively stringent as automakers compete​ to produce the⁢ safest models. ⁢While both the 2003 Volkswagen Touran and the current Hyundai Ioniq 5 received five stars, the latter offers superior safety. Today’s new cars often achieve maximum scores under⁤ older systems with relative ease, necessitating increasingly challenging standards.

Since 2016, a robust body structure alone is ‍insufficient. Euro NCAP ⁣has emphasized active safety technologies, assigning them a important role in the overall safety assessment.

There are times when⁣ physical passenger protection is⁢ no longer the⁤ only safety factor. Now much ‍attention​ is paid to preventing collisions ⁤and various systems that make decisions in the driver’s place.

One⁤ industry observer ⁣notes that active safety systems are ⁣crucial, but safety test results can sometimes provide an incomplete picture of a vehicle. For instance,the budget-amiable‌ Dacia Jogger received only one out of five stars.⁢ However, it ‌achieved 70% for adult passenger protection and 69% for ‌child protection, equivalent to a‍ three- or ⁤four-star rating, indicating a durable body.The⁣ low overall rating stemmed from a lack​ of active safety features, reflecting​ Dacia’s focus on affordability over advanced technology.

The Role of Auxiliary Systems

The Hyundai santa Fe exemplifies ⁤the impact ‌of active ⁣safety systems, receiving two different‍ ratings based on⁣ equipment.‌ While ⁤it performed well in collision ​tests, scoring 84%⁤ for adult protection and 88% for child protection (comparable to luxury vehicles), ⁤the base model received four stars, while the model⁢ with additional safety systems earned the maximum five.

The impression‍ that physical protection⁣ is now less ‌vital than smart technology. in my opinion, physical protection ‍should continue to be priority, ⁤because that will protect us in the ⁢event of a real collision.Of course, electronic security systems allow‌ you‍ to avoid collision at all, but‌ they are only useful if you work. Plus can also work inaccurately over time when the rider shuts⁣ down all systems at the ‌time of the⁣ accident, the seat belts and the airbags.

According to‌ one expert, safety rating agencies may have shifted their focus from passive to active safety because⁤ manufacturers ⁢have mastered building durable bodies. However, emphasizing electronic systems could mislead potential buyers, especially given rising new car⁣ prices.

American Priorities

Consumers seeking ⁢safe vehicles should also consult the U.S. Insurance ‌Institute for‍ Highway Safety (IIHS) tests,⁤ particularly for models sold in America. The IIHS places greater emphasis on crash resistance.

they have more collision test scenarios. For exmaple, a frontal collision ‍against the body is very cruel and the car can be seriously damaged.They also carry out tests on trucks‍ and try a very wide spectrum ⁣of impact as⁣ they⁣ do not exclude​ the driver from the driving⁣ process.

The IIHS evaluates​ passive safety ⁣in greater detail, using a simpler scale of⁣ “good,” “acceptable,” “marginal,” and “poor.” The safest models earn the ⁤”Top⁣ Safety Pick” designation.

In 2024, the Hyundai Motor Group dominated the “Top Safety Pick” list with 22 models, including nine ⁢Hyundai cars (from⁤ the ⁢i20‍ to the Santa ⁤Fe), eight⁣ Genesis models, and five Kia‍ models.The hyundai Ioniq‍ 5 and Ioniq 6 were recognized as among the safest cars in both Europe and⁣ the U.S.‌ Other highly rated models​ included the Tucson, Santa Fe, and⁤ Genesis GV80, all equipped with thorough safety systems and demonstrating⁤ excellent front and rear protection.

Other vehicles earning⁣ the “Top Safety Pick+” designation included the Acura Integra,⁢ Toyota Prius, ​Mercedes-Benz E-Class, Mazda CX-30, Ford Mustang Mach-E, BMW X3, BMW X5, Lexus NX,‌ and Volvo XC90.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

__typename:AdviceKeyword}, {id:568, {id:645, Slug: Technology, slug:automasinas, Title: cars, Title: Technology

Search:

News Directory 3

ByoDirectory is a comprehensive directory of businesses and services across the United States. Find what you need, when you need it.

Quick Links

  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions
  • About Us
  • Advertising Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

Connect With Us

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service