Cardi B Wins New Trial Request Against Security Guard

HereS a breakdown of the key information⁤ from the provided text, focusing on the legal case and⁣ witness testimonies:

The Case:

* This article discusses a legal case involving ‍a dispute between a woman named Ellis and Almánzar. It ⁤appears Ellis sued Almánzar, and a jury sided with almánzar.
* Ellis’s lawyer, Ron Rosen Janfaza, filed a motion for a new trial, which was denied by Judge Fusselman.

Key Witnesses ‍& Testimony:

* Dr. David Finke⁤ & Tierra Malcolm: These were crucial witnesses for Almánzar. They ⁣testified they heard yelling, saw⁢ Ellis with a phone, and believed Ellis was the aggressor.‍ Malcolm also testified that Ellis later asked her to help with an employment claim ‍related to the incident, which malcolm refused.
* Almánzar’s Testimony: She stated she randomly ⁤visited dr. Finke as a precaution while in Los Angeles for work and wasn’t promptly sure of his name.
* Dispute over Witness Identification: Ellis’s lawyer claimed Almánzar intentionally hid the⁤ identities of Finke and Malcolm. Almánzar’s lawyers countered that the defense found the witnesses through their ⁤own investigation and that Almánzar had tried to involve Malcolm in a lawsuit against Ellis shortly after the incident.

Judge’s Ruling & Sanctions:

* Judge Fusselman denied the motion for a new trial.
* He acknowledged allowing the defense to add witnesses late but pointed out Ellis was also allowed to add names to her witness list.
* the⁤ judge plans to sanction Ellis’s lawyer, Ron Rosen Janfaza, for⁤ repeatedly mentioning a psychologist to the jury despite the doctor being barred as a witness and no evidence of a face-to-face meeting existing.

In essence, the article details the aftermath of a trial, focusing on the arguments made in a failed attempt to overturn the jury’s decision and the judge’s⁢ rebuke of ‍the defense lawyer’s conduct.