Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Caught with Someone Else’s iPad: Am I a Thief or Just a Forgetful Finder

Caught with Someone Else’s iPad: Am I a Thief or Just a Forgetful Finder

September 18, 2024 Catherine Williams - Chief Editor Sports

Man Found Not ‌Guilty ‌of Embezzling Lost iPad in Second Trial

A‍ man in⁢ his 50s, who⁤ was taken to⁣ trial for keeping an iPad‍ that someone else had lost‌ for over a‍ month, was found not guilty ⁣in both the first and ⁣second trials.

The Suwon High ⁤Court Criminal Division 1 (Judges Moon Ju-hyung, Kim Min-sang, and⁤ Kang⁣ Young-jae) ⁢announced⁤ that it had found Mr. ⁣A, ⁣who⁤ was indicted on⁣ charges of embezzlement of lost property, not‌ guilty, as in the original trial.

Photo = Getty Images Bank

The court ruled, “If we examine closely the evidence that ​the‌ lower court legally adopted and​ examined, the lower court’s ⁢decision to ⁢find the defendant not guilty is justified,” and “It is difficult to see that the defendant embezzled lost property with ​the intention⁤ of keeping it for himself‌ without the​ intention of returning it when he ⁤acquired it.”

According to the court, Mr. A was indicted on charges of embezzling property that had been‌ taken from Mr. B’s ⁣possession​ without returning it and taking the iPad worth 1 million won that he had lost on a badminton‌ court bench in the ‌apartment complex on the afternoon of‌ November ​7, ​2022.

The police who received the report at the time ‍checked the ‍CCTV ⁣footage and found ‌that they had visited Mr. ‌A’s house on December 21 of the same year.

Person B claimed during the⁢ police investigation ⁤that the name tag and photos of his dog attached to the iPad had⁢ been removed, and that this did not appear to ‍be the actions of someone who intended ‍to return the iPad.

However, the court⁣ ruled that there was no objective ​evidence submitted to prove whether Mr. A had ⁣a picture of his dog attached to the iPad when he acquired ​it, and that it was difficult to conclude that‍ the defendant​ had tried to directly unlock the password ‌but failed or deleted the data based solely on the victim’s statement.

Also, on December 30th of ‌the‌ same year, the defendant’s spouse posted a comment on the​ victim’s post ‌about ‌the loss of the iPad, saying, “Time has ⁤passed ⁤because ​I was so anxious. Please contact me‌ and I will discuss how ‍to⁤ deliver it.”

Considering that ‍the iPad ‍was arbitrarily submitted ​to⁤ the police in February 2023, ​there was no evidence that ⁤the victim’s request​ for⁤ its return was refused or avoided.

Suwon = Reporter⁣ Lee Young-gyun ‍lyg0203@segye.com

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

Search:

News Directory 3

ByoDirectory is a comprehensive directory of businesses and services across the United States. Find what you need, when you need it.

Quick Links

  • Copyright Notice
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

Connect With Us

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service