Skip to main content
News Directory 3
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
Menu
  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • News
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • World
ChatGPT ‘Game of Thrones’ Sequel Idea: AI Copyright Case Judge Reference

ChatGPT ‘Game of Thrones’ Sequel Idea: AI Copyright Case Judge Reference

October 28, 2025 Victoria Sterling -Business Editor Business

Okay, here’s a breakdown of the key details from the provided text, focusing on the ​copyright‍ lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft:

Core Issue:

* ​ Authors are suing OpenAI and ⁢Microsoft (likely due to Microsoft’s investment in and use of OpenAI’s technology) for⁢ copyright‌ infringement.
* The lawsuit alleges ⁢that ‌OpenAI’s large ‌language models (LLMs) were trained on copyrighted⁤ works without permission.
* Specifically, the lawsuit centers around details generated by ChatGPT​ that closely mirrored elements ⁣of an ⁢unpublished book by ⁤the plaintiffs. These details included:
* ⁤ A ‍novel ⁢kind of “ancient dragon-related​ magic.”
* New claims to the Iron Throne from a Targaryen relative ⁢named Lady Elara.
* ‍ A rogue sect of Children of the Forest.
* ⁤ The author’s lawyer,Stein,believes the details provided by ChatGPT were substantial enough to justify the lawsuit moving forward.

Legal Status & Context:

* A manhattan-based ⁢judge has allowed the class action lawsuit to ‍proceed.
* The judge will later rule on whether OpenAI and Microsoft can claim a “fair use” defense.
* Fair⁣ Use is a key point: This ‌legal doctrine allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission for purposes like criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. Whether training ‍an ‌AI ‍model ⁢falls under fair use is a major legal question.
* ⁤ Recent precedent⁣ (Mixed):

* A previous case against Anthropic (another AI company) initially found ‌their use of⁢ copyrighted books for training was protected by fair use.
* Though, Anthropic later settled that lawsuit for $1.5 billion to authors. ​This settlement suggests a willingness to compensate authors even ⁤if a fair use defense exists.

Key Players:

* ‍ Plaintiffs: authors whose works were‍ allegedly used⁣ to train the AI models.
* Defendants: OpenAI and Microsoft.
* Anthropic: another AI company involved in a similar lawsuit,providing a relevant comparison point.

In essence, this lawsuit is part of a larger⁢ legal battle over the copyright implications⁣ of training AI ⁤models on vast amounts of data, including copyrighted​ material. ⁢The outcome could significantly impact the future of⁤ AI progress and the ⁣rights of authors.

Share this:

  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

Search:

News Directory 3

ByoDirectory is a comprehensive directory of businesses and services across the United States. Find what you need, when you need it.

Quick Links

  • Copyright Notice
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms and Conditions

Browse by State

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado

Connect With Us

© 2026 News Directory 3. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service