Supreme Court Rejects Carlos Wagner‘s Bid to Reopen “Notebooks” Case Proceedings

Buenos Aires, Argentina – The Supreme Court of Justice has definitively rejected an attempt by Carlos Wagner, a key businessman accused in the sprawling “Notebooks” corruption case, to revisit crucial aspects of the investigation.The court’s decision, signed by Justices Horacio Rosatti, Carlos Rosenkrantz, and Ricardo Lorenzetti, effectively upholds previous rulings and ensures that Wagner’s challenges will not derail the ongoing trial.

Wagner’s Appeal Dismissed Over Procedural grounds

Wagner, a former executive of the Argentine Chamber of Construction (CAC) and one of 31 individuals who have declared as “repentant” in the case, sought to have the Supreme Court reconsider the initial assignment of the investigation to Federal Judge Claudio Bonadio. His defense also aimed to challenge the validity of his own collaboration agreement, wherein he confessed to paying bribes and detailed a system of cartelized public works during the Kirchner administrations.

The Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the appeal was based on a procedural technicality: the defense’s arguments were not directed against a final sentence or an equivalent judicial determination. This means that the core issues raised by Wagner’s legal team will now be adjudicated within the framework of the ongoing oral trial.

“Repentant” Businessman’s Testimony Central to Case

Carlos Wagner’s role as a “repentant” witness has been pivotal in the “Notebooks” investigation. In his testimony, he admitted to facilitating bribe payments and provided detailed accounts of how public works contracts were allegedly manipulated by specific companies during the tenure of former Planning Minister Julio de Vido. wagner described mechanisms for paying bribes, including direct payments and the return of portions of funds received for completed work. He was indicted as a member of an alleged “Illicit Association,” with former President Cristina Kirchner identified as its leader.

Defense’s Previous Attempts to Nullify Case

the defense’s latest move follows a series of unsuccessful attempts to have the entire case declared null and void. Prior to the Supreme Court’s intervention, Federal Oral Court No.7 had already dismissed Wagner’s claims that his statement was made under duress and that the case had been subjected to “Forum Shopping” – an alleged deliberate selection of a favorable court and prosecutor (Carlos Stornelli). The court found that the assignment of the case had been settled early in the investigation and that Wagner had not been coerced into testifying against himself.

The Federal Criminal Cassation Chamber had also previously rejected an appeal filed by Wagner’s defense. The Supreme Court’s latest decision effectively closes the door on these procedural challenges, allowing the case to proceed to its conclusive oral trial phase.